... since the only thing separating the "roads" here is paint, at least according to the Bing imagery.

Привіт,
У цьому наборі змін ви явно видалили деяку інформацію про мову. node/10939642188/history є одним із прикладів. Попередня назва була російською, і ви видалили її та додали дві українські назви в «name» та «name:uk». Назва місця – це будь-яка його назва – і це може бути іншою мовою, яку ви бажаєте. Перегляньте osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only.
Ви не повинні робити автоматичний переклад, який знову видаляє інформацію, і ви повинні робити це лише після досягнення згоди з іншими користувачами в Україні. Наразі вони, здається, не підтримують ваші зміни - див., наприклад, https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/automated-edits-avinet-ua/99879/22.
З найкращими побажаннями,
Енді Таунсенд, від імені робочої групи даних OSM.

Hello,
In this changeset you have clearly removed some language information. node/10939642188/history is one example. The previous name was in Russian, and you removed that and added two Ukrainian names in "name" and "name:uk". The name of a place is whatever its name is - and that might not be in your preferred language. See osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only .
You must not make automatic translations that remove information again and you must only do so when you have reached an agreement within the other users within Ukraine. Currently they appear not to be in favour of your edits - see for example https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/automated-edits-avinet-ua/99879/22 .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

你好爸爸雷伊，
您添加了一些看起来像个人标记的东西（还有一些看起来什么都没有，比如在海中央的 ATM 上 node/10931496905 ）。
如果您想创建个人标记，可以使用 MAPS.ME 中的“书签”来实现。
我将删除您到目前为止添加的内容，因为其中一些内容似乎显然不属于 OpenStreetMap。
如果您有任何其他问题，请发送电子邮件至 [email protected]，主题为“[Ticket#2023053010000033] Papa rey”。
此致，
Andy Townsend，代表 OSM 的数据工作组。

Hello Papa Rey,
You've added a few things that look like personal markers (and some that don't see to be anything, like at ATM in the middle of the sea node/10931496905 ).
If you'd like to create personal markers you can do that using "bookmarks" in MAPS.ME.
I'll remove the things that you've added so far, since some of them don't seem to obviously belong in OpenStreetMap.
If you've got any further questions please email [email protected] with a subject of "[Ticket#2023053010000033] Papa rey".
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

¡Hola Johana y bienvenida a OpenStreetMap!
Ha agregado aquí el nombre "Hogar" para mostrar que es una casa. No hay necesidad de hacer eso, ya que OpenStreetMap usa "etiquetas" para mostrar qué son las cosas (el nombre es solo el nombre). Tampoco es necesario agregar una etiqueta de "identificador".
Alguien ya cambió este, solo para avisarte. Cualquier otra pregunta, por favor no dude en preguntar!
Atentamente,
Andy

Hello Johana and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
You've added the name "Hogar" here to show that it is a house. There's no need to do that, since OpenStreetMap uses "tags" to show what things are (the name is just the name). There's also no need to add an "indentificador" tag either.
Someone's already changed this one - just letting you know. Any other questions, please don't hesitate to ask!
Best Regards,
Andy

There's a cattle grid on it, so I'd imagine that most horse routers will try and avoid that :)
If it was a locked gate on a private bit of road and the bridleway actually ran to the side, then a bunch of "no" tags would make sense, but presumably foot access isn't actually illegal across the cattle grid, and people are free to hop across on foot (or use the gate) as required?
I'm not overly familiar with the area and can certainly think of places in Yorkshire where a private cattle crid has been added in parallel with a gate on a public road (with access rules posted about the cattle grid).

Actually, the changes in this changeset look at bit odd: https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=136971395 . Presumably the "foot=no" on way/929336505 is supposed to encourage people on foot to avoid the cattle grid rather than saying that they are legally excluded from it?

Hello,
All of your changesets seem to have the same comment, "Work in this area is to update way locations and access tags at NT's $place. For more info on the organised editing activity see: osm.wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/National_Trust_Paths". Please don't do that - instead say what it was you actually changed, and why.

Hello,
In this change you've increased the san_scale for https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/839038651 from alpine_hiking to difficult_alpine_hiking. Was that deliberate?
Best Regards,
Andy

Hello xzaviar, and welcome t OpenStreetMap!
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.
Can you explain why you reverted this changeset without discussion?
There's a thread ongoing in the Italian forum at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-edits-in-italy/97706 - please do reply either here or there. If you don't do that and continue editing we'll have to assume that this account has also been created by the bad actor who's causing the problems elsewhere, and revert this and other similar edits.
Best Regards,
Andy

Thanks!

Hello,
What is the source used here "AnyGIS_Sat_clean_HD; AnyGIS_labels_en"? All Saints Church looks odd - it has an image tag that points at a Google Map. I ask about the source because we can't actually Google Maps as a source in OSM because Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. If it's somewhere that you've actually been and are familiar with then "local_knowledge" would be a a perfectly good source for OSM. If Google was used as a source, then we'll have to remove Google-sourced things that you've added to OSM.
Also, where did "Sherburn in Helmet" come from? That's got Spaceballs vibes to it that I wouldn't really associate with a small commuter village in Yorkshire :)
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

Indeed, but the comment I linked to suggests that the editing should not start until the discussion has completed.

Ahem: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/automated-edits-avinet-ua/99879/13

"Local knowledge" of every postbox in the UK is pretty impressive :)

(OK - I know that's not what you meant...)

Sorry, "this" didn't remove it, changeset/137041173 did, but it still needs adding back to the relation...

Hello, this removes way/487937738 from the Chilterns AONB, which means it is no longer closed.

Thanks