Hello andi9876. Thanks for your message. In my opinion, these are not entrance and ramps which are signified by links (osm.wiki/Highway_link) but a continuation of the same road and route. There is a bifurcation point at node/5727662532 but the lane of AH11 continues (though with a slight turn in geometry) and other ramps/links simply join it. However if you choose to return them to links I will not object. Have a good day.

Halo Brayat Mentaok. Selamat datang di komunitas OSM! Saya perhatikan bahwa Anda mengubah beberapa jalan sempit dari perumahan ke trotoar baru-baru ini di Yogyakarta dan menyebutkan bahwa itu hanya untuk pejalan kaki dan sepeda motor dengan pengetahuan lokal. Sangat menyenangkan memiliki update data OSM lokal di Yogyakarta.

Saya ingin menyebutkan bahwa klasifikasi living_street adalah klasifikasi resmi OSM Indonesia untuk jalan/gang yang berjarak 1,5 meter hingga sekitar 2 meter yang dapat diakses oleh kendaraan kecil dalam satu arah. Pedoman penandaan khusus negara tersebut dapat ditemukan di sini: osm.wiki/Indonesian_Tagging_Guidelines#Roads.

Beberapa klasifikasi ulang Anda ke jalur pejalan kaki akurat untuk lorong yang sangat sempit yang kurang dari 1,5 meter tetapi yang lain berpotensi dapat diakses oleh mobil kecil seperti way/530631242. dan way/954261459. Ini tampak selebar tetangga jalan perumahan mereka yang terlihat di pencitraan udara, namun saya tidak bisa memastikannya. Bisakah Anda mengkonfirmasi ini? Sangat dihargai.
-RiverBearings

Hello Brayat Mentaok. Welcome to the OSM community! I noticed that you are changing some narrow roads from residential to footways recently in Yogyakarta and mentioning that they are only for pedestrians and motorbikes with local knowledge. It is great to have a local updating OSM data in Yogyakarta.

I wanted to mention that the living_street classification is the official Indonesian OSM classification for those roads/alleys that are 1.5 meters to about 2 meters that could conceivably be accessed by a small vehicle in one direction. Those country specific tagging guidelines can be found here: osm.wiki/Indonesian_Tagging_Guidelines#Roads.

Some of your reclassifications to footway are accurate for very narrow passages that are less than 1.5 meters but others could potentially be accessible by small cars such as way/530631242. and way/954261459. These seem as wide as their residential road neighbors that are visible in aerial imager, however I cannot be for certain. Can you confirm this? Much appreciated.
-RiverBearings

Hi Nigh King, thanks for your contributions to OSM. I noticed in this changeset and many others that you have deleted some important buildings, administrative boundaries and road names (i.e.(way/488357513/history, way/491092987/history, way/370418167/history ). Here are some other changesets where valuable information was also deleted (https://osmcha.org/changesets/115943738/, https://osmcha.org/changesets/115941701/, https://osmcha.org/changesets/115940299/, https://osmcha.org/changesets/115938850/, https://osmcha.org/changesets/115938227/) Was this intentional? I can restore the information that was removed if this wasn’t planned. Please let me know, thank you.

Hello again, bernardo60. You are welcome to make those changes. Thanks for the work you do on the map in Bali. Have a good day!

Hello Parvel Melec. I noticed a large amount of duplicate overlapping data that you added in the area of the towns of Merci (node/989594938) and Doncor (node/989452282). I had to revert these changesets since there were four layers of duplicate data in this large region. When mapping please be aware of copying and pasting data and its good practice to validate your changesets before each upload for similar errors. You can find more information about the core data validator and its use here: osm.wiki/JOSM/Validator. JOSM basics can be found here as well - osm.wiki/JOSM#Video_Tutorials, https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Introduction & https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help. Happy mapping and good luck going forward!
-RiverBearings

Bonjour Parvel Melec. J'ai remarqué une grande quantité de données en double qui se chevauchent que vous avez ajoutées dans la zone des villes de Merci (node/989594938) et Doncor (node/ 989452282). J'ai dû annuler ces modifications car il y avait quatre couches de données en double dans cette grande région. Lors de la cartographie, soyez conscient du copier-coller des données et de ses bonnes pratiques pour valider vos ensembles de modifications avant chaque téléchargement pour des erreurs similaires. Vous pouvez trouver plus d'informations sur le validateur de données de base et son utilisation ici : osm.wiki/JOSM/Validator. Les bases de JOSM peuvent également être trouvées ici - osm.wiki/JOSM#Video_Tutorials, https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Introduction & https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help. Bonne cartographie et bonne chance pour la suite!

Hello Parvel Melec. I noticed a large amount of duplicate overlapping data that you added in the area of the towns of Merci (node/989594938) and Doncor (node/989452282). I had to revert these changesets since there were four layers of duplicate data in this large region. When mapping please be aware of copying and pasting data and its good practice to validate your changesets before each upload for similar errors. You can find more information about the core data validator and its use here: osm.wiki/JOSM/Validator. JOSM basics can be found here as well - osm.wiki/JOSM#Video_Tutorials, https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Introduction & https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help. Happy mapping and good luck going forward!
-RiverBearings

Bonjour Parvel Melec. J'ai remarqué une grande quantité de données en double qui se chevauchent que vous avez ajoutées dans la zone des villes de Merci (node/989594938) et Doncor (node/ 989452282). J'ai dû annuler ces modifications car il y avait quatre couches de données en double dans cette grande région. Lors de la cartographie, soyez conscient du copier-coller des données et de ses bonnes pratiques pour valider vos ensembles de modifications avant chaque téléchargement pour des erreurs similaires. Vous pouvez trouver plus d'informations sur le validateur de données de base et son utilisation ici : osm.wiki/JOSM/Validator. Les bases de JOSM peuvent également être trouvées ici - osm.wiki/JOSM#Video_Tutorials, https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Introduction & https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help. Bonne cartographie et bonne chance pour la suite!

Hello Parvel Melec. I noticed a large amount of duplicate overlapping data that you added in the area of the towns of Merci (node/989594938) and Doncor (node/989452282). I had to revert these changesets since there were four layers of duplicate data in this large region. When mapping please be aware of copying and pasting data and its good practice to validate your changesets before each upload for similar errors. You can find more information about the core data validator and its use here: osm.wiki/JOSM/Validator. JOSM basics can be found here as well - osm.wiki/JOSM#Video_Tutorials, https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Introduction & https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help. Happy mapping and good luck going forward!
-RiverBearings

Bonjour Parvel Melec. J'ai remarqué une grande quantité de données en double qui se chevauchent que vous avez ajoutées dans la zone des villes de Merci (node/989594938) et Doncor (node/ 989452282). J'ai dû annuler ces modifications car il y avait quatre couches de données en double dans cette grande région. Lors de la cartographie, soyez conscient du copier-coller des données et de ses bonnes pratiques pour valider vos ensembles de modifications avant chaque téléchargement pour des erreurs similaires. Vous pouvez trouver plus d'informations sur le validateur de données de base et son utilisation ici : osm.wiki/JOSM/Validator. Les bases de JOSM peuvent également être trouvées ici - osm.wiki/JOSM#Video_Tutorials, https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Introduction & https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help. Bonne cartographie et bonne chance pour la suite!

Hi, bernardo60. MonteGeneroso is no longer on the team, but I can try to answer your question. It seems that the highway was changed from secondary to primary due to it connecting large towns to Semarapura, which fits the description on the OSM Wiki for primary highways (highway=primary). There’s also a greater number of OSM GPS Traces along this route, which suggests it’s traveled on more than surrounding routes. What do you think about setting way/795486625 and way/814841838 to secondary and leaving the highways south of node/273931567 as primary?
Best,
RiverBearings

Hello angys,
Footyfootfella is no longer on the team. However when we return to this area in the near future we will look into the alignment edits you mentioned.
Could you update the AH150 route relation members (relation/5288245) and any necessary way tags of those trunk way members before those alignments are made by chance? There are gaps near way/1033308766 and possibly other places.
Thanks - RiverBearings.

Hello mutiaputriutami. I see that you added a no_straight_on restriction (relation/13056897) on this prominent route with ESRI Imagery. There is a painted stop line there but no permanent physical barrier. In this https://kartaview.org/details/2344278/672/track-info from June of 2020 you can see that the road is unobstructed and these temporary plastic diversions are there for construction. Since the resources show no permanent barrier, could you delete that restriction to allow routing through? Also the classification could be promoted to tertiary or even secondary as it provides important connectivity between the secondary roads on either side that it connects to. Thanks and let me know if you come to a different conclusion. RiverBearings.

Olá DressyPear4. Chinook23 não está mais na equipe, mas posso tentar responder sua pergunta. É claro que há uma via navegável visível nas imagens, mas não ficou 100% claro se era uma ponte ou um bueiro. Vejo que você já adicionou a tag de volta, o que faz sentido neste caso. Obrigado por entrar em contato e atualizar as tags no segmento da ponte. Tenha um ótimo dia!

Hi DressyPear4. Chinook23 is no longer on the team, but I can try to answer your question. It is clear there is a waterway visible in imagery but it wasn’t 100% clear if it was a bridge or a culvert there. I see that you already added the tag back which makes sense in this case. Thanks for reaching out and updating the tags on the bridge segment. Have a great day!

ff5722. Thanks for your thoughts on this. Perhaps new imagery with ref signage will become available someday. Thanks again for looking into the issue though.
Have a good day.
-RiverBearings

Punam koriala, You have used the square tool on roads here. I have reverted this changeset. Please take a look at the JOSM tool basics here https://learnosm.org/en/josm/josm-tools/ before uploading more changes to the map. Thank you.

Punam koriala, You have used the square tool on roads and landuse polygons here. I have reverted this changeset. Please take a look at the JOSM tool basics here https://learnosm.org/en/josm/josm-tools/ before uploading more changes to the map. Thank you.

Hello ff5722. I wanted to reach out about the new motorway that is contained in the members of relation/11697166. This route does not have ref tags on its ways or that relation. Would you happen to know if the Asian Highway 12 (ref=AH12 relation/229600) should have its members and ref tags moved away from the primary route just to the east and moved to the motorway? Any information with either getting ref tags established on the motorway or identifying another OSM community member who might know authoritatively would be a great help. Thanks and have a good day.

Olá, O Fim. Pueyrredon não está mais na equipe, mas posso tentar responder à sua pergunta. Parece que Pueyrredon reclassificou as calçadas para atender rodovias em um estacionamento que se conecta à calçada way/461276497. Concordo que as conexões entre a calçada e a rua são importantes para o roteamento, e aqui existe através de way/965914984 e way/966375200. Farei conexões adicionais nas faixas de pedestres para melhorar o roteamento, pois o Mapillary está disponível nesses locais. Obrigado por trazer isso à minha atenção e tenha um ótimo dia.

Hello, O Fim. Pueyrredon is no longer on the team but I can try to answer your question. It looks like Pueyrredon reclassified footways to service highways in a parking lot which connects to the sidewalk way/461276497. I agree that connections between the sidewalk and street are important for routing, and here it exists through way/965914984 and way/966375200. I’ll make additional connections at the crosswalks to improve routing since Mapillary is available at those locations. Thanks for bringing this to my attention and have a great day.

سلام بهینام. من متوجه شدم که شما اخیراً در حال تبدیل جاده های موجود به ویژگی های مانع هستید. این‌ها به‌عنوان تغییرات برچسب نامعتبر در OSMcha مانند https://osmcha.org/changesets/111197379 پرچم‌گذاری می‌شوند. برچسب مانع برای نوع خاصی از ساختار فیزیکی جدا از جاده ها است که ممکن است نزدیک به آن باشند - barrier=*. اگر دانش محلی از این موانع در نزدیکی جاده ها و رودخانه ها دارید، می توانید آنها را به عنوان ویژگی های جداگانه اضافه کنید، اما تبدیل جاده ها به موانع، آن جاده را از شبکه موجود حذف می کند. متشکرم و روز خوبی داشته باشید!

Hello behinam. I noticed that you are converting existing roads to barrier features recently. These are flagged as invalid tag modifications in OSMcha such as https://osmcha.org/changesets/111197379. The barrier tag is for a certain type of physical structure separate from roads that they might be near to - barrier=*. If you have local knowledge of these barriers near roads and rivers you can add them in as separate features but converting roads to barriers will remove that road from the existing network. Thanks and have a good day!

Xapitoun. Merci d'avoir examiné. Je mettrai à jour l'itinéraire avec la signalisation trouvée au rez-de-chaussée. Espérons que plus d'images seront ajoutées à l'île dans un proche avenir. Passe une bonne journée.

Xapitoun. Thanks for reviewing. I will update the route with the signage found on the ground level. Hopefully more imagery will added to the island in the near future. Have a good day.

Bonjour Xapitoun. J'ai remarqué que vous avez supprimé la référence RN 8 de la Route Nationale #8 il y a plusieurs années dans cet ensemble de modifications (changeset/36518002). Toutes mes recherches suggèrent qu'il s'agit toujours d'une route nationale existante qui traverse la frontière avec la République dominicaine. Il existe quelques images de panneaux au niveau du sol de la mi-2019 qui confirment cela dans chaque direction : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=18.531069034959&lng=-72.050481868902&z=17&pKey=1919676084850148&focus=photo&trafficSign%5B% 5D=all&x=0.6371777136178712&y=0.5663844537669023&zoom=2.092404688995829 & https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=18.527863868725&lng=-72.041342356175&z=17&pKey=903395393726286&focus=photo553012901308x50.5 &zoom=1.328328005333698.

Je voulais vous informer du problème avant de le remplacer par RN 8. Si vous avez d'autres ressources suggérant qu'il devrait avoir une balise alt_ref= RD 111 (de l'ajout dans ce osm.org/ changeset/56210635), faites-le moi savoir et je peux également l'inclure. Merci!

Hello Xapitoun. I noticed that you removed the RN 8 ref from Route Nationale #8 several years back in this changeset (changeset/36518002). All my research suggests that this is still an existing national route that crosses the border with the Dominican Republic. There are a few ground level images of signs from mid-2019 that confirm that in each direction: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=18.531069034959&lng=-72.050481868902&z=17&pKey=1919676084850148&focus=photo&trafficSign%5B%5D=all&x=0.6371777136178712&y=0.5663844537669023&zoom=2.092404688995829 & https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=18.527863868725&lng=-72.041342356175&z=17&pKey=903395393726286&focus=photo&trafficSign%5B%5D=all&x=0.7395301238136885&y=0.5903840900883057&zoom=1.328328005333698.

I wanted to inform you of the issue before I change it back to RN 8. If you have any other resources that suggest it should have an alt_ref= RD 111 tag (from the addition in this changeset/56210635), let me know and I can include that as well. Thanks!

Utami_setyorini. Thanks for verifying and updating the tagging. The conditional oneway looks good to me! Have a great day.