OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
92374715 about 5 years ago

Hey there, your edits look good! I don't see any issues right now.

Let me know if you have questions.

92057752 about 5 years ago

Hey Martin, this was unintentional as a result of an oddity in how iD handled conflict resolution from a previous changeset.

91161724 over 5 years ago

Hello,

I have reverted your changes. To indicate a private beach, please change the access by adding a tag access=private to the beach. Please do not delete items just because they are private, just indicate the access level.

Thanks.

91069394 over 5 years ago

This changeset failed and was reverted.

91070410 over 5 years ago

These were junk references to Daniel Boone National Forest with no relevance in the real world. All useful data was added to the new polygon.

91070111 over 5 years ago

Apologies, could not figure out a way to use the replace geometry function on a multipolygon of this size. Original variant was very roughly sketched, and was off by up to several miles at points.

All tags were copied from the original.

91070314 over 5 years ago

Apologies, could not figure out a way to use the replace geometry function on a multipolygon of this size. Original variant was very roughly sketched, and was off by up to several miles at points.

All tags were copied from the original.

91070320 over 5 years ago

All tags were copied from the original.

91070320 over 5 years ago

Apologies, could not figure out a way to use the replace geometry function on a multipolygon of this size. Original variant was very roughly sketched, and was off by up to several miles at points.

89478197 over 5 years ago

Whoops, drew over imagery without downloading data without realizing it. One of those days. I'll be fixing.

87892602 over 5 years ago

Sorry, just passing through the area and made these edits.

87511219 over 5 years ago

Good call, that was the wrong tag. Thanks for changing it.

85632400 over 5 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM! Just for your information, if the whole area of the school is tagged with the name, we generally don't name the main school building as well, because it duplicates things.

Let me know if you have questions!

84224956 over 5 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM! Your edits look solid. Let me know if you have any questions in the future.

83612667 over 5 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM! Just wanted to say that your first work is really good, especially the level of detail on the houses. I think 114th Place Southeast got set accidentally to a oneway street, so I fixed that. Otherwise, really well done.

Please reach out if you have any questions!

81294171 almost 6 years ago

One of the key rules is never to "tag for the renderer", which OSM buildings essentially is in this case. OSM buildings is third party software, and therefore should not be used as the basis for changing the core OSM dataset. We had similar issues with people changing data to make certain things happen in the game Pokémon Go. I'd submit a request to whoever maintains that software to add a conflation algorithm to conflate the names from the amenity=school area onto the biggest building within the bounds of the school area or just add the school areas directly to the map.

81294171 almost 6 years ago

Hi, just a heads up, these schools have what are called school grounds (they show up yellow) that surround the main building. The convention is to only name the grounds, not the building with the name of the school. Otherwise there is a duplicate entry for every school.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks for your edits though!

80875482 almost 6 years ago

Don't add fake nonsense.

79806982 almost 6 years ago

Why are you deleting the golf course? There is no reason to do so. I will be reverting this change.

78181637 about 6 years ago

Feel free to delete it as the local expert