Hallo,

ist die Straße wirklich auf ihrer gesamten Länge eine Einbahnstraße, die nur entgegen der OSM-Wayrichtung befahren werden darf? Schau dir mal bitte ihre Länge an: way/24726903

Hast du das vor Ort geprüft? Dieses "KI"-Zeug spuckt oft auch einfach Müll aus, gerade dann, wenn Straßen meist nur in eine Richtung befahren werden, weil man in die Gegenrichtung anders günstiger fährt. Ähnlich verhält es sich mit Abzweigungen, bei denen bestimmte Abbiegebeziehungen selten befahren werden, weil man anders schneller ist.

Viele Grüße

Michael
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62160961

Hallo,

Kreisverkehre brauchst du nicht aufteilen, außer wenn sich ihre Eigenschaften (Belag, Beleuchung, …) im Laufe des Kreises ändern. Routenrelationen allein sind kein Grund.

Ich korrigiere das mal, zumal an der Kreuzung auch ein paar Busroutenrelationen kaputt sind.

Viele Grüße

Michael

Das Mappen von einzelnen Grundstücken als landuse=residential ist zwar auch nicht empfehlenswert, aber sie ersatzlos zu löschen und das mit "Adressen Lichtenstein" zu begründen, ist noch schlechter.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62202112

siehe changeset/62205969
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62204134

Hallo angelika,

warum löscht du kommentarlos Flächen mit dem Tag landuse=residential, ohne dass es dafür einen Ersatz gibt?

Bitte mach das wieder rückgängig!

Viele Grüße

Michael
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62204699

Hallo angelika,

warum löscht du kommentarlos Flächen mit dem Tag landuse=residential, ohne dass es dafür einen Ersatz gibt?

Bitte mach das wieder rückgängig!

Viele Grüße

Michael
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62205969

Looks good to me.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62205083

Hi,

you asked for a review. I can't review it on the ground but I hope you wanted a remote review only. ;-)

It looks excellent but I wonder if "Westminster US36 bikeway cyclist/ped shelter/amenities" is really a name and not just a description. Please have a look at osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Best regards

Michael
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62205672

Hi Bryanna M,

thank you for reverting. I would have done the same. This is a case similar to changeset/62158981

Best regards

Michael

Hi,

welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You added motor_vehicle=designated to a path. Are you sure? Paths are usually too small for most motor vehicles (except motorcycles). way/621678991

Could you please fix this?

Best regards

Michael

Hi,

welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I appreciate your effort on adding important details for pedestrians. It is a lot of work but it can be helpful for pedestrians

However, the sidewalks you added are currently only useful as eye-candy. They cannot be/are not used by any routing software because they are not connected to each other and connections to the road network are also missing. Pedestrians using this sidewalk network cannot even change the side of a street because there is no connection between the sidewalks. It is not even possible to turn left/right at an intersection because the two sidewalks don't share a node.

Could you please improve your sidewalks? There are two options:

(1) Add the missing connections at all intersections, add intersection nodes where ever any other street crosses the sidewalk and add a common node where to sidewalks intersect. Please don't forget to map the crossing nodes (highway=crossing + crossing=*) and don't forget to add footway=sidewalk to all sidewalks. Look at Graz, Austria or any other well mapped city as an example (e.g. osm.org/#map=19/47.58560/-122.30852).

(2) Delete all the sidewalks and just add sidewalk=* to the street. Use sidewalk=left if there is only a sidewalk on the left side, sidewalk=rigth if it is only on the right side, sidewalk=both if both sidewalks exist and sidewalk=none if no sidewalks exist. Please note that the sidewalk=* tag is not used by almost all map styles, i.e. many OSM based maps won't show them any more. However, it is in the data and I suspect that there are applications using it.

It would be a real pity if all your sidewalks would lie around in the database without anyone being able to use them properly.

Best regards

Michael

Hallo Jonas,

vielen Dank für deine Antwort.

Ich habe mir gerade mein Video angesehen. Von Sarstedt kommend gibt es auf Gleis 3 kein allein stehendes Zs 3. Das heißt, die 100 km/h gelten bis zum Ausfahrsignal (Zwischensignale gibt es in Barnten nicht).

Am Ausfahrsignal steht jedoch laut Benutzer Nobelium ein Lf 7 120 km/h Richtung Hildesheim. node/3677724816

Wie passt das denn mit deinen Ergänzungen zusammen?

Noch ein Hinweis: La, Buchfahrplan und EBuLa dürfen wir nicht als Quelle verwenden, weil DB Netz uns dazu keine Erlaubnis erteilt hat. Nur was an der Strecke steht oder mit einem GPS-Empfänger gemessen werden kann (z.B. Geschwindigkeit bei Hp 2 ohne Zs 3) kann verwendet werden. Der Buchfahrplan ist eine Datenbank (den Begriff bitte nicht wörtlich nehmen) und genießt als solche urheberrechtlichen Schutz.

Viele Grüße

Michael

Hallo Manuel,

bei Gebäude 40–42 sind die Adressnodes dann trotzdem richtig. Man kann sie (und das ist die dritte Erfassungsvariante) in solchen Fällen auch als Nodes am Eingang erfassen, die Teil des Rands des Gebäudes sind.

Es gibt bei OSM fast kein festes Regelwerk. Es ist loses, teils nicht richtig festgeschriebenes Gewohnheitsrecht, das sich in den letzten 14 Jahren herausgebildet hat. Wir sind keine solche Regelwerksfanatiker wie manche in der deutschen Wikipedia. osm.wiki/DE:Good_practice enthält das Wichtigste. Nur für Importe, mechanische/automatische Änderungen und de-facto auch für organisierte Aktivitäten gibt es echte Richtlinien.

Viele Grüße

Michael

Hi,

welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I appreciate your effort on adding roads.

However, the data you added is not really useful at the moment. There are a few issues and I would like to ask you to fix them:

1. Please draw straight geometries without loops or forth-and-back-and-forth or zigzags (except where the road is zigzag).

2. Please use a sensible classification for the roads, not just "tertiary" for everything. I am sure that many of these roads are too unimportant to qualify the tertiary class. If you are not sure, use "unknown type".

Could you please fix these issues?

Best regards

Michael

Hi msprax5,

why did you only draw buildings without adding the roads leading to the village?

Best regards

Michael

Hi,

please do not add fictional data to OpenStreetMap. It is a serious project and you harm those who use the data to save lifes.

Best regards

Michael

Hi Sarah,

Hi,

welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I appreciate your effort on adding buildings and roads. It is nice to see another village on the map.

However, the data you added is not helpful. There are a few issues and I would like to ask you to fix them:

1. The road classification looks wrong. There can't be that much high-level roads like primary, secondary and tertiary roads in a village. Primary roads must connect large towns and cities. Secondary are important roads between villages and towns, etc.

If you don't know what to choose, choose "unknown road type" or ask your supervisor.

2. Roads, streets and footpaths must be connected at intersections. They must share a common node. Otherwise routes cannot be calculated.

3. Your roads must be connected to the nearby trunk road ("Great East Road").

4. Roads must not go back and forth, they should not intersect with themselves or have circles inbetween. Please split these roads.

Best regards

Michael

Hi,

welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I appreciate your effort on adding important details for pedestrians. It is a lot of work but it can be helpful for pedestrians

However, the sidewalks you added are currently only useful as eye-candy. They cannot be/are not used by routing software at the moment because they are not connected to the road network on this continent. In addition, pedestrians could not even change the side of a street at an intersection because there is no connection between them. This leads to the situation that pedestrians are caught in a often circular island circumfenced by streets they are unable to leave.

Could you please improve your sidewalks? There are two options:

(1) Add the missing connections at all intersections, add intersection nodes whereever any other street crosses the sidewalk. Please don't forget to map the crossing nodes (highway=crossing + crossing=*) and don't forget to add footway=sidewalk to all sidewalks. Look at Graz, Austria or any other well mapped city as an example (e.g. osm.org/#map=19/47.58560/-122.30852).

(2) Delete all the sidewalks and just add sidewalk=* to the street. Use sidewalk=left if there is only a sidewalk on the left side, sidewalk=rigth if it is only on the right side, sidewalk=both if both sidewalks exist and sidewalk=none if no sidewalks exist. Please note that the sidewalk=* tag is not used by almost all map styles, i.e. many OSM based maps won't show them any more. However, it is in the data and I suspect that there are applications using it.

It would be a real pity if all your sidewalks would lie around in the database without anyone being able to use them properly.

Best regards

Michael

Hi,

welcome to OSM.

It is nice to see your company on OpenStreetMap. However, object does currently not meet our quality standards w.r.t. business entries:

1. Any data in OSM must be factual and surveyable on the ground. "XXX is a Canadian leader in YYY." is not. It's just advertising.

2. Please add proper tags to the object, describing what it is, e.g. an office, a shop or something else. Your entry is currently a point with a name and contact details only. No application will notice, no map will show it.

I would be happy to see these issues being addressed by you because it would be a pitty if your entry would be caught by our spam filters.

Best regards

Michael

Hallo WHahn,

gibt es bei node/5871052995 noch ein Wegekreuz oder ähnliches?

OSM erfasst nur die aktuelle Realität, keine historischen Zustände. Dafür ist unser Datenmodell nicht ausgelegt. osm.wiki/DE:Good_practice#Mappe_keine_historische_Ereignisse_und_ehemalige_Objekte

Könntest du daher nicht mehr existente Objekte, die du eingetragen hast, wieder löschen?

Falls du eine Karte erstellen möchtest, die die Kreuze über einer OSM-Hintergrundkarte einzeichnet, sei dir http://umap.osm.ch/de/ empfohlen. Die dort getätigten Änderungen landen nicht in der OpenStreetMap-Hauptdatenbank.

Viele Grüße

Michael