Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you abbreviate this name considering osm.wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29 ?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116764647

https://www.green-wood.com/rules/ lists opening hours for each entrance. Is there a way to tag such info?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116748485

Hello.
First of all, OSM MUST NOT BE USED FOR SPAM!
Changeset comments MUST not contain promotional or advertising messages! They should contain explanation of what your edited! We do not care what kind of services you offer or who can help. That is irrelevant to OSM.
Secondly, when you add POI to OSM, you must follow the rules. Description field MUST NOT contain advertising or promotional messages! It must be a description of that POI! Biz hours must follow a specific format documented in the wiki.

Finally, why did you add 2 different POI when all the research shows that you provide services either in Greenville, SC or online?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116707526

I simply combined node (which had wrong street name) with the building of the same street address.
Looking at google's streetview history, seems like this location changed businesses twice since. :)
I'll fix it based on your photo. 👍

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete inscription tag on a memorial node and why did you set sidewalk to layer -1, implying that it's underground?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116597057

Hello. Is this exclusively commercial area?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116595472

I personally don't have strong opinion about either way of tagging, however iD complained that amenity=dancing_school tag is "outdated" and recommended removing it.
Also, looking at taginfo, amenity=dance_school has just over 400 uses globally, while leisure=dance has ~9000 uses, and dance:teaching=yes/no has ~5000 uses.
Again, I don't mind the other tag, but I suspect if it wasn't me, somebody else will come around and remove it.

Your changeset covers most of the world.
What kind of typo are you fixing?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116549088

Hello.
Please note that it is incorrect to include feature description as its name. Please see this article for more detailed explanation: osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
If you want to indicate that it's a residential house, instead of tagging it as "building=yes", you should tag it as "building=detached".
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116513135

Wikidata article is specifically for the statue in London. Shouldn't each copy of this cast have its own wikidata Q article?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116482491

Perhaps tell them in the other changeset that it was a bad detection for them to fix the script and prevent them from "fixing" this building again?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116472704

Hello.
Please do use meaningful changeset comments - “.” does not help other mappers understand what you are doing. You can also read about it in more details at osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116453564

Hello.
You changed a subway track to be a residential road. That's obviously incorrect.
You also deleted what appears to be correct tags from a community center building.
As such this edit is going to be reverted to restore the correct information.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116438745

😅 Sometimes I get carried away fixing iD's warning about templates and other simple stuff.

Hello.
Do you have some sort of supporting information that this area is no longer for polar bears but for dholes?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116408632

Hello.
Rather than deleting it, would be better to move it back where changeset/102283497 originally messed it up. 👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116406617

If this statue is permanently gone, perhaps all references should be removed in OSM(and mapped in OHM)? OSM is about what's now, not what was...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116400699

Here are 3 more visualizations that show that I did NOT change amenity of this node! This was a bus stop before I edited and it was a bus stop after I edited it! At no point was this EVER a store!
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=116323976
https://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=116323976
https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#116323976

It seems like you don't know how to read changesets or don't understand what they do.
Perhaps these 2 sites will show you better:
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/5638710760
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/5638710760
I will accept my apology from you now.

If you are going to revert changesets, at least you can look up correct stop name on the official website and make it accurate
https://mtabus.org/routeschedules/route-map/route-8/