MxxCon's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 142474784 | about 2 years ago | Hello.
|
| 142457724 | about 2 years ago | Hello.
|
| 142456033 | about 2 years ago | I think this whole relation should be deleted.
|
| 142441019 | about 2 years ago | Hello.
|
| 142415848 | about 2 years ago | cute, but you missed a few streets..
|
| 142414324 | about 2 years ago | Hello.
|
| 142406455 | about 2 years ago | Hello.
|
| 142399888 | about 2 years ago | Hello.
|
| 142368910 | about 2 years ago | Hello.
|
| 142294601 | about 2 years ago | If you are making such massive change, at least make sure that it follows all the guidelines as documented in phone=*#Usage 👎
|
| 142207745 | about 2 years ago | I think it shouldn't be landuse= tag. Each object as appropriate and perhaps with "location=roof" |
| 141918643 | about 2 years ago | You could use EveryDoor app. It's specifically intended for working with POIs.
|
| 142208030 | about 2 years ago | Same owner can be indicated using operator= tag on both features. That makes it easier to edit in the future. Relations are awkward and clunky to deal with if connected features need to be modified. For simple situations like this I think there's no need to complicate things with relations. |
| 142286585 | about 2 years ago | Hello.
|
| 142285957 | about 2 years ago | Hello.
|
| 142219961 | about 2 years ago | Hello.
|
| 142208417 | about 2 years ago | Hello.
|
| 142207745 | about 2 years ago | Is it considered "landuse=" if it's on the roof?
|
| 142208030 | about 2 years ago | Hello.
|
| 142195331 | about 2 years ago | While your changes are not incorrect, perhaps those mapping programs should be updated to properly render this?
|