On the screen where you enter your changeset comment, if you scroll down it shows a list of all the objects you'll be changing.

Hello.
Should "construction:" prefix be removed from some of these ways?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151600525

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you create this relation? Relation of relations seems severely unnecessary here.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151598904

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you create this relation? West Tremont Avenue is already properly tagged as ways all the way through.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151598813

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you create this relation? East Tremont Avenue is already properly tagged as ways all the way through.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151598428

All of these changes are incorrect. You damaged Tokyo's boundary relation. And you added fountain tag to the wrong features in the 9/11 memorial in NYC. Fountain is already tagged there. You tagged incorrect element.
In the future, please, pay closer attention to what you are mapping, *especially* such high-profile places as NYC and Tokyo.

All of these changes will be reverted in full.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151590783

Hello.
You added construction_start_expected= tag to these features with dates in the past.
Does that mean construction did not start?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151585199

It's kinda hard to review a changeset for potentially incorrect data deletion when it has 1186 modified objects...

Hello.
Please note that the branch name should go into branch= tag. You can read more about this tag at branch=*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151569138

Well, looking at 11891776069
"name=La Gran'mere du Chimquiere" and "name:en=Menhir Statue 1800BC" are wrong. One is not the English translation of the other.
Looking at 11891775669, what is it?
node/11891775974, this is NOT how you tag bike rental place.
node/11891775672, this is NOT how you tag a port.
Plus all the other problems...

And what is the source of all this data?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151108208

You can list multiple names separated with ;
Or we also have honorary_name= and official_name= tags. I don't know what exactly those names are so apply tags as appropriate.

But then you get data inconsistency with alt_name= and alt_name:en= not matching/being translation.

Then it should be split/mapped as 2 buildings tagged as semi-detached.

Hello.
What is the source of this information?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151554016

Hello.
It's a different business but they kept the same email address?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151553636

Hello.
The correct way to encode kids ride free is "fee:conditional=no @ age < 12". You can see this documented at fee:conditional=*
Also I don't think toll=yes is a valid tag here. Rather it should be fee=yes.
Please correct these issues.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151552200

Hello.
You tagged this building as semi-detached, but this building is not attached to anything else...
Could you please elaborate on this?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151527781

Hello.
Please note, as documented at year_of_construction=* this tag must be used ONLY for the finished construction and the dates in its values must NEVER include dates in the future.
This should be corrected.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151521648

Hello.
When mapping landuse areas, they should not be glued to the nearby roads but rather be mapped to their actual shape.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151512795

SEO spam reverted.

changeset/151561416