LakatosVL's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 166085011 | 7 months ago | Hi Mimośród,
|
| 165777389 | 7 months ago | Hi Đuro Jiří,
|
| 156462437 | over 1 year ago | Hi Cartografias Vitales,
|
| 153239455 | over 1 year ago | Hi gurglypipe.
|
| 146616242 | almost 2 years ago | Pozdrav,
|
| 117773543 | almost 4 years ago | Thanks for letting me know, I have change the first two tags, and for third it refers to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banyumasan_dialect. Do you know any other way to tag it? |
| 117769420 | almost 4 years ago | Hi InsertUser, thanks for the info. I have checked osm.wiki/Collaboration_with_Wikipedia#Importing_geodata_from_Wikipedia_into_OSM which describes an issue with importing geodata from Wikipedia, but this is more in term of adding new features to OSM using coordinates from Wikipedia.
Thanks
|
| 114745602 | about 4 years ago | Thanks for the information. I agree that these could be seen as a redundant information, so we will refrain from using name:es or any other mother language. Thanks for your insight and feel free to reach out with any advice or suggestion. |
| 107816945 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Thanks for the suggestion. I’ve seen these types of issues in several places in Chile. Still, since there were a lot of highways in this area that were already mapped and aligned by Maxar or Esri, I georeferenced these streets respectively to this microregion. If you feel that the whole microregion needs to be realigned feel free to fix these streets as well. Thank you, I’ll keep an eye out for these issues in the future. Thanks,
|
| 99955346 | over 4 years ago | Hi, When it comes to the segment that intersects with a waterway, I could split it from here 2.9564985, -75.2630009 to here 2.9567355, -75.2628091 and add ford=yes (Key:ford - OpenStreetMap Wiki) to that segment. Due to riverbank being mapped this wide, potentially, if you want you can split it here 2.956203, -75.2630869 and here and 2.9564931, -75.261295 and add tag ford=yes. I would not recommend this solution since the riverbank is not reflecting the state of the river on any of the imageries. Also, these 2 areas of riverbanks should be physically connected into one single area or as a relation (Tag:waterway=riverbank - OpenStreetMap Wiki). Hope this helps,
|
| 82133272 | almost 6 years ago | Pozdrav Branko,
|
| 75822737 | about 6 years ago | Hi Bytemark, Thanks for your comment! We are mapping waterbodies as we have a aerial imagery, but we don't have a ground truth which lakes are oxbow by classification and which are not. Also we don't know exactly which lakes are intermittent and which are not. We are doing a hard and time consuming work here to map polygons of all waterbodies that we can see, so locals can add appropriate tags. Together we can create the best map that exist on the market! Thanks,
|
| 72519070 | over 6 years ago | Hello CloCkWeRX,
Regards,
|
| 66457933 | almost 7 years ago | Hi,
|
| 48988272 | almost 7 years ago | Yes, I will change it. Thanks |
| 48988272 | almost 7 years ago | Hi Glenhope1,
|
| 31936187 | almost 7 years ago | Thanks Cleary. I altered name as shows LPI NSW Base Map. If you find that the name has changed, be free to change it. |
| 31936187 | about 7 years ago | Thanks for a answer, I will put altname from LPI NSW Base Map until we get another information. |
| 31936187 | about 7 years ago | Hello,
|
| 62514867 | over 7 years ago | Thanks once again! :) |