OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
156462437 over 1 year ago

Hi Cartografias Vitales,
I saw you are very active in this region which is great, but can you pay more attention on tagging ways, connectivity and classification of the roads, administrative boundaries, relations and etc.
I found that you are add wrong tags on administartive boundaries, some ways are deleted, which course broken relations.
Please can you chek and fix this one:
relation/3541280
relation/11937925
relation/3541287
way/263658730
way/1314654425
way/1314549503
...
Thanks Vladimir.

153239455 over 1 year ago

Hi gurglypipe.
Thanks for pointing this out. The task description is updated. Most of the hints includes verification on whether the used tagging scheme is not in conflict with other tags and for most of it we are contacting local community members for additional information.

146616242 almost 2 years ago

Pozdrav,
postoji na sva tri snimka (Bing, Esri i Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta), postoji i na drzavnim podacima kao putna parcela i RGZ ju je uvrstio kao produzetak ulice. Stavljen je kao track zbog kvaliteta puta, ali ga ja ne bi sklanjao jer je vidljiv a i nije dobio naziv bez veze sigurno je u planu izgradnja kuca u produzetku.

117773543 almost 4 years ago

Thanks for letting me know, I have change the first two tags, and for third it refers to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banyumasan_dialect. Do you know any other way to tag it?

117769420 almost 4 years ago

Hi InsertUser,

thanks for the info. I have checked osm.wiki/Collaboration_with_Wikipedia#Importing_geodata_from_Wikipedia_into_OSM which describes an issue with importing geodata from Wikipedia, but this is more in term of adding new features to OSM using coordinates from Wikipedia.
I was doing different thing, which is enriching the map with variant names, for the entity that already exists in both OSM and Wikipedia. Please take look at last sentence: "Note that one is still allowed to add the same information to both Wikipedia and OpenStreetMap, both are using nonexclusive licenses" so I don't think there is any violation of licenses.

Thanks
Vladimir

114745602 about 4 years ago

Thanks for the information. I agree that these could be seen as a redundant information, so we will refrain from using name:es or any other mother language. Thanks for your insight and feel free to reach out with any advice or suggestion.

107816945 over 4 years ago

Hi,

Thanks for the suggestion. I’ve seen these types of issues in several places in Chile. Still, since there were a lot of highways in this area that were already mapped and aligned by Maxar or Esri, I georeferenced these streets respectively to this microregion. If you feel that the whole microregion needs to be realigned feel free to fix these streets as well.

Thank you, I’ll keep an eye out for these issues in the future.

Thanks,
Vlada

99955346 over 4 years ago

Hi,

When it comes to the segment that intersects with a waterway, I could split it from here 2.9564985, -75.2630009 to here 2.9567355, -75.2628091 and add ford=yes (Key:ford - OpenStreetMap Wiki) to that segment. Due to riverbank being mapped this wide, potentially, if you want you can split it here 2.956203, -75.2630869 and here and 2.9564931, -75.261295 and add tag ford=yes. I would not recommend this solution since the riverbank is not reflecting the state of the river on any of the imageries. Also, these 2 areas of riverbanks should be physically connected into one single area or as a relation (Tag:waterway=riverbank - OpenStreetMap Wiki).

Hope this helps,
Vlada.

82133272 almost 6 years ago

Pozdrav Branko,
prilikom dodavanja lokalnih poljskih puteva nehotice sam zalepio put za granicu, istražio sam temu na forumu i hteo bih da pohvalim vaš rad i napor. Hvala puno na ukazanom previdu. Ispravljeno :-)
S poštovanjem Vlada.

75822737 about 6 years ago

Hi Bytemark,

Thanks for your comment!

We are mapping waterbodies as we have a aerial imagery, but we don't have a ground truth which lakes are oxbow by classification and which are not. Also we don't know exactly which lakes are intermittent and which are not.

We are doing a hard and time consuming work here to map polygons of all waterbodies that we can see, so locals can add appropriate tags. Together we can create the best map that exist on the market!

Thanks,
Vladimir

72519070 over 6 years ago

Hello CloCkWeRX,
I fixed this issue.
Thank you for checking and
for letting me know.

Regards,
LakatosVL

66457933 almost 7 years ago

Hi,
please can you answer to warin61 question.
Thanks

48988272 almost 7 years ago

Yes, I will change it. Thanks

48988272 almost 7 years ago

Hi Glenhope1,
at this location -35.593449761996396, 146.5886298936233 I found that you put name is Western Road, but the LPI NSW Base Map shows Goode Road. Can you confirm which one is correct.
Thanks

31936187 almost 7 years ago

Thanks Cleary. I altered name as shows LPI NSW Base Map. If you find that the name has changed, be free to change it.

31936187 about 7 years ago

Thanks for a answer, I will put altname from LPI NSW Base Map until we get another information.

31936187 about 7 years ago

Hello,
this is a huge changeset, at this location -31.18719, 148.5420291 I found that the old name is Ulundry Road, but the LPI NSW Base Map shows Nortongong Road. Can you confirm which one is correct.
Thanks

62514867 over 7 years ago

Thanks once again! :)

62514867 over 7 years ago

Thanks for additional comment. I would like to spend as much as possible time to create riverbanks, and please, you are more then welcome to add this tag if you think it should be there. I'm not familliar with the region and I can map only what I can see from the imagery. Currently many of us are mapping rivers and we are trying to add as much as possible polygons that describes riverbanks.

62514867 over 7 years ago

Thanks for the support, we are here for you.