I went ahead and made the tag updates to follow the schema for pylon and adjusted the outline the best I could as it was based on the shadow before. I hope this is better but Ill defer to you on any further adjustments or if you want to keep it or not. Feel free to modify.

Hi Adamant1, thanks for checking that after looking again I agree with you bridge:support=yes may not be the best tag there. Looks like bridge:support=pylon via bridge:support=pylon would actually be the best tag here and it supports the use of the building tag but the building tag should be building=service. What do you think? If you agree I can make the change no problem otherwise if you would rather not have it mapped at all Ill defer to you it ok with me either way.

Hi impiaaa, thank you so much for your catch there, I mistakenly forgot to keep that info there, I missed it in the relation. I have just put those tags back and updated that building wall section as you mentioned here: changeset/119307898. Sorry about that. I agree there are better tools out there for splitting existing areas, Ill keep that in mind next time.

Thanks wireguy, I think I have fixed it by changing the relation type to site: changeset/114674392 I hope that solves the issue.

Thanks MxxCon I saw your solution in your changeset, that looks good. Thanks!

Hi MxxCon,
Based on the official facility map these buildings are listed as "Pier # Cargo Shed" map can be found here: https://www.panynj.gov/content/dam/port/customer-library-pdfs/facilities-map.pdf however I am sure there are specific warehouse/container businesses operating out of them that could be added as nodes. I agree the names seem pretty general... I could make them a note tag instead, open to suggestions...

Hello! Just wanted to mention that I think the church you added here: way/962343223 seems to map the square area for the church as a building but really the building is a different structure inside of the square and is much smaller. Id suggest removing the building=yes tag from the polygon and then if you still wanted to add the building, to add the building using the building footprint in the imagery that is inside of the square. Otherwise you could just change the square polygon to fit the actual church building footprint instead and that would solve it too.

Hello it looks like this changeset added building outlines on top of existing outlines, now there are many duplicate building outlines that all overlap. Is there a plan in place to fix those and remove the overlaps?

I went ahead and corrected the name on the poi for Riley_Andersen, it looks like it also needed an amenity tag. Funny enough via a google search it looks like Riley_Andersen tagged this poi for the house of the main character in Inside Out... regardless it still should not be tagged as such...

Hello, it looks like this changeset added a duplicate poi for the airport here that already exists as a node here: node/309894742 another user has already corrected this in this changeset: changeset/104269912 to avoid this its best to merge your edits to any existing map information if it make sense to do so to avoid duplication. However in your original edit you added a very small area for the airport when its really a much larger area, Id suggest future edits when drawing airport boundaries should take into consideration the entire airport property - typically this can be seen on imagery with fence lines or look at a property/tax map for the area to get an idea of where the real boundary is.

Hello, it looks like this changeset has deleted the two buildings that were here. Can the buildings be put back here with the original tags?

Hello, it looks like this changeset has removed valid building and height tags from the hotel building here. Also it looks like it deletes a building that is adjacent to this structure. The building and tags should still be valid. I have fixed this issue for you here but please be careful in future edits.

Hello, it looks like this changeset has removed valid tags from this location. The building tag and school tags were removed. This is still a building and there is still a school here. I think the hotel belongs next door. I have updated this for you here anyway but please be more careful in future edits.

Hello, this changeset looks like it has misshaped the adjacent building outlines. I have fixed this for you here but please be more careful in future edits.

Hello, it looks like this changeset removed the building and height tags from this building, since these are still valid tags they should stay there. I have gone ahead and already fixed this issue for you.

I have fixed this case for you.

I have fixed this for you.

I have fixed this for you.

I have fixed this for you.

I have fixed this for you.