IraGersh's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 149636876 | over 1 year ago | I will be here on April 25, 2024 and take many photos to add to features. |
| 149502814 | over 1 year ago | I removed the crossing tags and there were no complaints from iD. I was following guidance from landuse=traffic_island Previously there were warnings and suggestions which included traffic_calming and I felt this had nothing to do with traffic calming. |
| 149502960 | over 1 year ago | Thanks. Will check it out. |
| 149390044 | over 1 year ago | I've since modified it, removing the surface tag (I agree it was weird), changed the feature to a footpath from steps. Its all based loosely on way/1221117506 with some exceptions as the latter is in NZ and this is not. Also, I don't think mooring is appropriate. The dock functions as a mooring but not the ramp. |
| 149390044 | over 1 year ago | material=aluminum and surface=* was the advice from someone on the community forum. They said that while the ramp was aluminum the surface could be anything. In this case its a non-slip rubber mat. I suppose that tag could be removed. I wrote about the non-slip rubber mat in the description and as someone on the US Slack said gangway will confuse them, I'll just remove that tag. Bottom line. I have to go there again anyway. |
| 149336546 | almost 2 years ago | Yes. Its a common mistake I make and I usually catch it. I always check that the link works before I close it out. |
| 149336330 | almost 2 years ago | The node was part of the steps so I figured I could attach a photo there. Id did not complain. It does seem odd. |
| 149156543 | almost 2 years ago | Big thanks for that. |
| 149156048 | almost 2 years ago | Its now subject:wikipedia. Thanks. |
| 149156048 | almost 2 years ago | For dimensions I matched the aerial view. |
| 149156543 | almost 2 years ago | Did you fix it? |
| 149156248 | almost 2 years ago | The cleat (area) is definitely seamark:type=mooring
|
| 145096881 | almost 2 years ago | Hi JayMontana36, I was able to select Public GPS Traces from the Map Layers choice, but then what? I'm only interested in bike and pedestrian traces. |
| 149110070 | almost 2 years ago | When the trees are full of leaves there is likely nothing visible. If you are hispanic you would hang out there. While nearby, there was a guy there, he left and brought back a friend. If you are white you probably wouldn't hangout there. This is as much a viewpoint as the one further north. I have yet to see a viewpoint that described what the view is. |
| 148795710 | almost 2 years ago | I was going to use overpass-turbo to find other nodes that have lamp_mount=lamppost. I would like to use "What iD shows are commonly used values. Many of those values can be wrong," This might help explain why the list of tags in a wiki is so much shorter than those that seem available in iD. Going forward I'm not touching anything that might affect a router unless it involves adding something. While I believe OSM would be generally helpful, most have never heard of it, but its still used in popular products like CityMapper. That said, anything I tag, I'll run though one of the external tools you mention. |
| 148795710 | almost 2 years ago | Thanks for the explanation. Changed them to straight_mast.
|
| 148819576 | almost 2 years ago | Fixed it. That Osmcha has amazing imagery. Have to look into it when I don't have to get sleep. |
| 148795710 | almost 2 years ago | Values of mount in ID
Then I found a link that doesn't list many either but the best match would be straight_mast.
|
| 148795710 | almost 2 years ago | Ok. that last one was a paste error. Will fix all much later. Thanks. They are the standard parks black lamp posts. |
| 148795710 | almost 2 years ago | What do you suggest? straight_mast?
And these are not masts. |