Det her var ikke smart lavet. Derfor har jeg reverteret

I have changed the wikipedia links for Saltholm and Hesselø back to their correct values.

From now on, please do not touch danish adress nodes. They are continually imported and updated from official registers via scripts and as I understand changes like this tends to mess up the process.

According to https://www.kristeligt-dagblad.dk/danmark/2014-11-28/tvivl-om-frihed-p%C3%A5-scientology-relaterede-friskoler this school was closed in 2011

"responsive AR routing" er det rene gibberish for mig, men jeg glæder mig til se hvad i kommer frem til :-).
I kender måske den danske OSM postliste: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-dk ?

Ok. Jeg undrede mig bare over de ret unikke tags i bruger :-). Medmindre i laver jeres egen private rendering er der såvidt jeg kan se ikke nogen ide i dem?

What are you trying to prove here?

Is this someones private home?

Hvad er "Himmelbjergruten"?

I brought this up on IRC and I'm seeing prominent members of the community agree that the Openseamap namespacing everything needs to stop.

The claim that you are not duplicating tags is complete nonsense. You have given the seamark:name=* tag the exact same value as the existing name=* tag. This to me is practically duplicating tags.

I worry because it's taking up unnecessary space in our database as well as complicating things equally unnecessarily.
Honestly I'm feeling very tempted to remove the crap

Why can't you simply use the name tag?

Is it really necessary to duplicate tags like this?

I found a wikidata item, which allowed me to put a name on the stone :-)

Please note that highway=pedestrian is for shopping streets etc only. Here highway=footway is far more appropriate.

Jeg har lært det :-). Denne her er 3 år gammel og dengang var der ifølge mine erfaringer mange af os der ikke rigtig var bevidste om det her. Langt hovedparten af de tilfælde jeg står som "last modifier" på, skyldes dog formentlig at jeg i skyndingen har kopieret tags fra en nærliggende sti eller modificeret en sti uden at være opmærksom på at der var uheldige tags på den.
Tak for dit gode initiativ og den fine præcisering på postlisten

Hmm. ok. Asfalten ser dog også meget ny ud på de fotos, så det kan være det er derfor.

Hvad er formålet med dette?

Please note that amenity=parking in itself is not considered a navigable entity. In order for navigation to work, all highway=* needs to be directly connected (I've fixed this here).