yeah thanks for that! as you can see I already have been reverting that partially some while now..

I thought it was needed for some API filters to work in JOSM which turned out to be a bug - after which I understood:"Ohhhhhh, that's an overkill on every node" LOL

but thanks anyway for the reminder I need to fix the remaining where I still have this nonsense going on which I created *silly me*

You couldn't have known this, but just for the record this is Secondary 21-21, Western Link Circumferential Road in the city ordinance 50 series 2019 p287 40/30 so I'll update it accordingly.

It's still a good thing you reduced the 50kmh as this is definitely not a 50kmh road :)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153281653

Redundant data - only add 20 once!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153091229

Shanum/Chanum street is max 20 for all
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152873011

Tank you and please keep in mind to avoid redundant information. Which has already been corrected.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152872972

Please read more careful the sources, the maxspeed here is 20 as per city ordinance.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152872963

Redundancy already removed, thank you
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152872949

Please try to avoid the redundancy in maxspeed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152872949

Please ensure the source:maxspeed is added with the max speed correction. Thank you
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152872934

The redundancy has already been corrected
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152872915

max speed for bus and trucks is redundant, so I'll remove it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152872915

It might be better to correct the overlapping instead of deletion - but in this case it'll be okay as in future we're going to use our high-res orthographic imagery for more detailed mapping anyways so we'll accept the deletion at this point.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152756469

Hi new mapper, thank you for your contribution to the city of Baguio mapping steps here. Kindly please continue mapping and if you need any assistance please do reach out. Keep up the good contributions.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152765776

I also checked ESRI as source, sadly I can not verify you're using ESRI as source, as ESRI shows me the same satellite imagery locations for that polygon as the BING satellite imagery is indicating. Sadly only Google is showing alignment with your data, but again, Google is not a legit source. So I reitereate kindly provide me your source, otherwise we have to flag you as using illegal data sources and revert your edits.

kindly looking forward for your response and providing the legit data source.

Hi Kerreralsland, thank you for your contributions in the city of Baguio. I have a question about the source you're using for editing the map. According to my BING satellite source your correction of the polygon-shape for the roads you edited here is wrong. it seems to me however they align properly with using google sat imagery as a source. Sadly Google is strictly prohibited as source for mapping and tracing activities other than google maps itself. Therefore I'd have to revert your changes - as you didn't point out the legality of your source(s), but before I revert your changes I'd kindly give you the opportunity to reveal your source for this edit.

Kind regards and please do keep up the mapping, using legal sources of course.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152796308

denomination=*

As per wiki, the religion shouldn't be removed and part of denomination. Thank you
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149940957

good edit, thanks
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150020657

Please don't add a duplicate for an existing feature. We have the general 1node/way/polygon per 1feature rule on openstreetmap. So if the feature already exists, add the additional data to the existing node/way/polygon
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150020852

Hi, please verify the map first, before adding duplicates. Thank you
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150021743

Hi thank you for taking time to explain it! It makes sense, yeah thank you so much..

I was wondering already in the past how do you know which colour belongs to which part? LOL

So thank you so much for explaining it.