Bob42nd we shouldn’t be mapping based on a Strava heat map as it doesn’t not determine that transiting in permissible. The heat map indicates that people have used it but we should be mapping on the ground with what form of transport is permitted.

Hi there, was in the area recently and it appeared that there wasn't any signage to indicate that bikes are permitted along the Harrap Creek Trail however is denoted as a shared path.

Previous changeset/120621671 has been reverted. Corrections discussed above now made under changeset/120651582

Thanks Vadmium. This changeset was only intended to capture the non-cycle path West of Sir Kenneth Luke Boulevard along the south side of Wellington Rd as you have pointed out.

I visited here yesterday. Saw the way on OSM but could not see a formal or informal track as shown at Braeside. Has this been verified on the ground?

I double checked my gps data and realised got my cross streets incorrect. Agree that it is Ellis Park Avenue where the shared path starts in a northbound direction. I think the way needs to be split south of Ellis park drive as a foot way and north of it to be retained as a shared path.

Mapillary data noted. I did not see signage heading east along Rivergum Place hence the change.

Good idea to split the way.
I don't necessarily agree on the path connecting St Andrew Court and McKay Avenue having bicycle=yes but I'll leave it be.

I agree this needs to be reverted. The colour of the court surfaces threw me off when I road along Wedgwood drive.
Refer to changeset/119498451

Mapillary data is acknowledged.
I rode past the Monash Freeway Onramp northbound up Gate Seven Drive, where there was no signage present. The Mapillary data you provided link to is much further north than I ventured, hence I believe the way needs to be split so that part footway up to Gate Seven Drive and be retained as a shared path further north.

I visited this location today after your initial link to Mapillary. The road markings heading north only last about 20-30m, which leads me to believe that perhaps that it intended to only go as far as way/95886163 which is also mapped as a shared path. There is definitely no shared path beyond the bus stop as there is only footways.

From the Mapillary info provided, there doesn’t appear to be any signage permitting bicycles on said road.
Given it forms part of a designated bike route perhaps bicycle = dismount might be the most appropriate.

I visited the area today and could not find any signage to indicate that way/788369313 is a path that permit bicycles. How have you concluded that this path permits bicycles?
This way appears to be a footpath was bicycles are not permitted.

I visited the area today and could not find any signage to indicate that way/540700910 is a path that permit bicycles. How have you concluded that this path permits bicycles?

I visited the area today and could not find any signage to indicate that way/66979596 is a path that permit bicycles. How have you concluded that this path permits bicycles?

I visited the area today and could not find any signage to indicate that ways on the bridge east side of Waterhaven Boulevard that permit bicycles.
How have you concluded that bicycle = designated?

I visited the area today and could not find any signage to indicate that ways west of Point cook road along the Skeleton Creek Trail are shared paths that permit bicycles.
The Hobson Bay council cycling route maps verifies the above. Suggest that ways are updated accordingly.

Correct. The footpath had been incorrectly tagged to permit bicycles which was what I corrected in the first place.
Agree the St Andrew’s Court is the bicycle route but being a roadway bicycles are permitted by.

Abstaining from making unnecessary comments on changesets for the sake of making comments would save a lot of time for all parties.
Mappers make contributions and corrections to the maps for the benefit of everyone.

Correct. Similar signage sighted for other changesets