OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
97523640 almost 5 years ago

Hi
this looks like a residential area. Therefore the roads should be highway=residential instead of service.
Also oneway=yes is missing at the split road next to the tertiary road.
I made the changes here: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97599271/

-Christian
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97523640

97587577 almost 5 years ago

welcome to OSM
The data you added looks really good. One thing you could improve is to make the changeset comment a bit more descriptive. For this example here I would have written something like "detailed sewage treatment plant"
This helps other mappers validate your changes.

Thanks and happy mapping =)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97587577

97235912 almost 5 years ago

There was still a small problem with the tunnel not being connected to the rest of the foot way. I quickly fixed it.
Thanks for working on fixing things.

97235912 almost 5 years ago

Thank you.
I took another look at it. the path and the new foot way still share a node. Therefore at the moment a router would be able to navigate from the path onto the foot way.

97284981 almost 5 years ago

Alright. Thank you for the response =)

97233289 almost 5 years ago

Hi
If you wanna add the new apartment buildings an their surroundings, Maxar Premium sat images already show them.
To see them look on the right side of the editor. There you'll see a symbol with 3 stacked layers (first symbol from the lower block). You can switch over to Maxar Premium images there.

Happy mapping
-Christian
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97233289

97233641 almost 5 years ago

Hi and welcome to OSM
Your changes are looking good
One thing I would add is waterway=dam (waterway=dam) to the path at the end of the pond. At least from sat images it looks like a little dam

- Christian
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97233641

97235912 almost 5 years ago

Hi
From the sat image I can see, it seems like the path along E 56th Ave and the new footway you added aren't connected.
If that's the case, you'll need to delete the node connecting the two paths and extend the tunnel (way/893868068) further.

If you need help let me know

Christian
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97235912

97278754 almost 5 years ago

Hi
I corrected your tagging a little. Since the highway has been demolished, I tagged it as removed:highway
way/878733802
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97278754

97284981 almost 5 years ago

Hi and welcome to OSM
Two short questions. Is it really correct that Blue View Rd can only be accessed with permission by the owner?
Also is the gate correct or should it be on the driveway to the east?(node/8310476139)

If you have any questions yourself, feel free to ask
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97284981

96469528 almost 5 years ago

Hi I saw that you changed this little road piece into a one way.
way/212055815
Because the left turn lane is still active, it caused an error through which I found this.
The latest Mapillary pictures (09/2019) still shows it as two way.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=97-Y_-uju9huCL9-20UDEg&lat=40.005571154480265&lng=-105.2712352760045&z=17

Has there been any changes recently?
If yes, I'm sorry because I already changed it back to two way road. And we should correct it as well as the left turn lane.

Christian
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96469528

96157790 almost 5 years ago

Hi short question:
I feel like 25 mph seems high for a parking lot.
I didn't see any speed limit signs in this video:
https://youtu.be/j7E319jumlo?t=773

Did you see it somewhere or is this standard driving speed (I'm a foreigner :)

95851238 about 5 years ago

Hi
I just took a look at your changes.
In general they are pretty good.
There is one small thing that I stumbled across. Near man-made objects you often draw roundish corners even though some have pretty sharp edges (for example here node/8230070449#map=19/9.11585/-79.70358&layers=D)
I saw this in a few other of your change sets too.
Please keep an eye out for that. If you have a ma-made waterline with sharp corners, please don't make them roundish. Thanks
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95851238

95739588 about 5 years ago

I fixed the mistake. I kept your newly drawn precise coastline but added it to existing island.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95739588

90072137 about 5 years ago

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap
Your business you added looked mostly correct. I added the address in the correct tagging scheme though.
While editing, you made a mistake and accidentally deleted the highway tag for Chapel Hills Dr. I fixed that for you. Don't worry, mistakes happen in the beginning.
Make sure you check before uploading your edits.

Cheers
Christian
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90072137

90546919 about 5 years ago

Ich hatte es so gemacht, da der Rest des Areals bereits so getaggt war.aber ich denke auch, dass path + foot=no besser wäre.
Kannst es gern schon ändern
Ich würde erst in den nächsten Tagen dazu kommen

90480384 about 5 years ago

super.
Vielen Dank =)

90726104 over 5 years ago

Hallo
Hier scheint etwas bei der Detallierung der Kreuzung durcheinander gekommen zu sein.
Man konnte nicht mehr von der Lilienthalstrasse auf die Nuerberger nach sueden abbiegen.
Ich habe jetzt das oneway=yes an einem abeschnitt entfernt und die Abbiegerelation korrigiert.
Schau bitte mal, ob das so stimmt
https://osmcha.org/changesets/91007242/
changeset/91007242

Gruesse Christian

90480384 over 5 years ago

Sollte jetzt wieder offen sein oder?

89692095 over 5 years ago

Hallo
schau mal ob diese Relation wirklich richtig ist:
relation/11522497
Kann man da wirklich nicht weiter auf der Landsberger Allee fahren?

Gruesse Christian