Hi it looks like you've accidentally modified an admin boundary in this changeset. To avoid this you can filter out boundaries via the map features drop down in the map data panel of ID editor, or the filter window of JOSM. I've restored the geometry of the boundary in changeset/164444498. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future.

Good correction of the highway geometry in the NW to avoid overlaps. Some highways here still overlap buildings visible in imagery. The stratgic use of splitting (x) and moving (m) can help move highways into alignment more quickly.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164178536

Good overlall a few buildings here could be a bit more accurate in orientation. You get the best orientation informatino when one pixel of the imagery maps to one on your screen which usually occurs when you're zoomed out. At the extremes features bias to the cardinal directions.--- The highway going E/W here goes more south on the Western side. You can see some highway modifications I made in the area in Changeset: 164441615 Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164178218

Looks like you accidentally modified a admin boundary here; you can filter them out in ID using (map features) in the map data panel to prevent editing them. If you find buildings which are not square check if their geometries are good if so it may be possible to simply square them, however in this case the geometry should have been improved as overlap errors may not be addressed by squaring alone.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164178014

Almost all buildings are valid. I recommend that you folow this procedure when mapping footprints. Add points based on the corners of the roof (can be a little smaller than the roof), tag, square (q), rotate (r) and scale (shift++/-).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164094815

Most footprints here are valid though some outline gardens visible in imagery barriers like walls can trick you into thinking they're buildings becasue they also cast shadows. Buildings under construction tend to have more going on within the extertior walls. the reason that buildings overlap highways here is because the geomerties are not accurate e.g. the footprint is simply too big to allow the highway to pass. The correct way to address this issue is to make the geomerty accurate so that there is enough space for all of the features you can see. Adding a layer=-1 tag would suggest that the building you mapped is underground. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164094480

All but a few buildings here are valid though the footprints are inaccurate. The vast majority footprints here should be squared (q). The building I flagged is far too large. You should try to give your best guess as to the footprint of a building even when it is obscured, but this footprint is about twice as big as it should be. Checking bing imagery gives a good indication of an accurate size becasue it isn't obscured. ---Highways should not share nodes with buildings Hold alt in ID to prevent the creation of shared nodes. You can sheck out ID editing shortcuts here osm.wiki/ID/Shortcuts Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164094341

I removed the name tags in Changeset: 164427698. Residential areas should not share nodes with building footprints.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164406721

You joined the nodes of this highway to a building footprint. Hold alt while editing to prevent your cursor from snapping to data. This highway crosses barriers and buildings and should not pass through this settlement. See Changeset: 164427507 for my resolution. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164407149

all footprints valid though some are inaccurate. Try to see if the footprint can be made accurate using squaring and circling then the ID editing shortcuts (?) before concluding that the building is based on a less likely shape. The footprint I flagged should be square not round.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164407021

The residential area should have been modified to prevent overlap with building footprints (outlined in mapping guide). All buildings here are valid though some are not accurate nor appropriately squared. Highways overlap footprints. Features should not be given a name tag unless they have a name; put hashtags in your changeset comment (when saving) instead. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164406721

Almost all of these footprints are valid though they could be more accurate. Some are oversized the Western building outlines two buildings.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164180948

Both of these buildings are valid and appropriately squared, though could have been a touch smaller.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164323467

This highway was modified in line with instructions to avoid highway building overlapps.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164181052

you improved the acuracy of these buildings, however they could still be more accurate and are generally oversized. It's easier to obtain accurate results by drawing the footprint a little undersized and then scalin it up after squaring. Thanks for modifying most of these footprints instead of deleting them and drawing new ones.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164180865

The footprints you added here represent buildings visible in imagery. They could however be more accurate and should have been squared using (q) after tagging. Generally it is easier to obtain accurate results if you undersize the footprints a little then scale them up after squaring: Press ? to see ID editing shortcuts to see how to do this.--- Unless you know that buildings share a common wall then you should not map them with shared nodes hold alt to prevent this. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164095115

I think that the highway network here may be over extracted; there's not necessarily a need to map all of these highways. I recommend to map highways by starting with those that have clear evidence of usage and are the widest ones like that which pass by the medical facility, then find the best routes which connect the residential areas/settlements you added. Highways should not share nodes with landuse areas. The highway continuity here is not accurate; 1 way should represent 1 highway and not multiple. I recommend downloading and using the apple paint style to help you see this. Using the measurement tool to measure the width of highways is useful in correctly classifying them. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162717710

All buildings valid, vast majority accurate. Appropriate modification of residential areas. Residential areas and highways should not share nodes.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164176843

All footprints added here are valid, the vast majority are accurate. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164177235

You correctly modified highways and a residential area to address building footprint overlaps.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164328907