all footprints valid and appropriately shaped but could be more accurate in size.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166864003

All footprints valid and accurate. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167154593

Valid deletion of significantly oversized building footprins and mapping more accurate ones. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166986253

A valid deletion of a significantly oversized footprint. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166986336

Same as the other water point comment. I flagged the water point. Why did you delete these nodes? Don't worry I added the POIs back to OSM in Changeset: 167117187. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166750406

Hi please do not delete POIs like the water point mapped here. I do not think that the imagery provides sufficient evidence for its deletion and it was originally stated to have been added after a survey. It is a feature beyond the scope of the project and does not appear to interfere with building footprints.--- I undeleted this feature in Changeset: 167116981 Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166676210

You correctly identified buildings from the imagery. I think the footprint I flagged does not represent a building.--- Some of the footprints were not sized as accurately as they could have been; accurate sizing leades to better population estimates. Take care to not include shadows in the building footprnt. The footprint can be a little smaller than the roof. Use ctrl + alt and your cursor to resize features in JOSM.--- Please map the smaller square features which also cast prominent shadows. A good rule of thumb is that you should add features 2 m^2<; using the measrement tool and selecting a feature will show you its area.--- Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166485572

Good job spotting the Western most building here I think that one is more difficult to identify.--- You did well mapping in the overcast area to the North: you can increase the imagery's brightness via the background pane (b) of the iD editor which can help map in areas like this. Sometimes the footprints you're mapping are ever so slightly oversized.--- Pitched roofs tend to overhang the walls of a building somewhat, so the footprint can be mapped slightly smaller than the roof for buildings with roofs like these. --- Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166450327

These buildings likely have round footprints. Buildings with thatch roofs can look somewhat irregular but the footprint underneath is likely either round or square. Roofs can overhang the walls of the building. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166162018

All building footprints here are valid, accurate and appropriately shaped. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166142849

Overall these footprints look to have been improved in accuracy. Some footprints used to envelope multiple buildings and now outline individual footprints. --- I think that one of the footprints I flagged envelopes multiple buildings and the other should be suared becasue it looks like it is distorted in the imagery. Buildings that are not round or have irregular angles tend to be located on junctions or are in densley built areas where that shape maximises the use of available space.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166409560

Hi generally the buildings you added here are valid and appropriately shaped but significantly oversized. Accurate footprint size is important for generating accurate population estimates. Take case when mapping and use an editing shortcut (shift+[-/+]) to scale selected features and make them the right size. Shortcuts can be found by pressing ? in iD editor. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166165518

Almost all footprints valid, appropriately shaped and accurate. I think that the footprint I flagged envelopes vegetation. It appears to have grown compared to Mapbox and colour is quite green. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166404646

The vast majority of footprints here are valid and appropriately shaped. The buildings I flagged here do not share a common wall so should not share nodes. Hold alt to prevent your cursor from snapping to existing data.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166400280

The southern footprint here is oversized (mapped as 100 m^2 actually ~ 65 m^2. Accurate sizing is improtant for accurate population estimates: you can scale selected features using shift+(-/+) to make them an accurate size. Thanks for mapping. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166403766

All buildings here are valid and appropriately rounded but are not as accurate as they could be. For example the Western most building was ~90 m^2 as you mapped it but is actually closer to 45 m^2. The accurate sizing buildings is important for accurate population estimates. Building footpritns can be the size of the roof, or smaller if the roof overhangs the walls; you can use the shortcut shift+(-/+) to scale selected features so that their size is accurate. The shadows round buildings cast help determine their size. Thank you for mapping.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166400548

A valid and accurate footprint. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166400796

The footprints I flagged here likely do not represent buildings; the others look valid.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166393084

All footprints valid and accurate. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166393469

All footprints added are valid. Please modify features you can identify instead of deleting them and redrawing. --- Highways should not share nodes with buildings. See the mapping guide of this project (link in instructions) to see how to resolve this.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166269624