The footprint in the north is valid, accurate and appropriately squared. I do not think that the two footprints in the south represent buildings, becasue the vegetation adjacent to them appears to be too short to explain the lack of shadow visible in the imagery. Overall the orientation of all footprints is accurate.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168367590

Hi Camille, I am not able to view the imagery source that you used to originally map these footprints, so I'm going based on what I see in other sources. I wanted to give you some feedback, since this is the only changset you uploaded, and I noticed you mapping on another project.--- I cannot comment much on the validity of footprints though I do think that you correctly identified some buildings. It looks like you correctly circularised footprints but didn't always square the others (q) .--- You also glued some nodes together in ways that appear unlikely to represent the ground truth. Your cursor will snap to existing data if you get too close: hold alt to prevent this. It is possible that you oversized the footprints you added making this more probable: to scale elements select them and use shift+(-/+). ID editor keyboard shortcuts are available when pressing ? ---Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167450594

Hello, thanks for attending the mapathon today! I think that all of the footprints you added here represent buildings, and virtually all of them are accurate and appropriately shaped. I only made minor modifications to a few of them. A high quality contribution. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168370870

You correctly identified buildings in imagery, but I think they should be square not round.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168366910

Hello, The vast majority of footprints here are valid though oversized and this has led to an overlap of footpritns here on one occasion. Some of the footprints you added do not represent buildings, reference the mapping guide for this area. I recommend watching the beginer mistakes videos on the missing maps youtube channel for a demo on how to resolve/avoid some of the issues preset here. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168141037

Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contribution. The footprints you added here are all valid and appropriately shaped but oversized. Please read my project comment regarding this topic. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168169811

Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contribution. The buildings you added here are valis and accurately shaped but are oversized. See my project comment regarding this subject. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168170665

Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contribution. All footprints you digitised here are valid and apropriately shaped but slightly oversized. See my project comment on this subject. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168170790

Hi Brandon, Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contribution. You correctly identified the buildings you added here and circularised them appropriately however they are generally oversized. See my project comment redarding this subject. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168170853

This is a valid, accurate and precise footprint. Please map them closer to this standard in future. Please generally upload more changes per changeset (save), I think it's better to save in terms of time e.g. every 5-10 mins or upon completion of a task. It makes them easier to work with. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166865801

This footprint is vaid and appropriately circularised but is oversized. Oversized features can casue overlap issues and lead to less accurate population estimates. Take care when tracing the footpritnt and use the shortcut shift+(-/+) to scale selected features after tagging and shaping them. --- Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166865541

You correctly identified buildings in the imagery however they are generally oversized. This led to overlapping footpritns in the SE; these overlapps stem from poor geometry and should not be resloved by using layer tags, becasue that hides the problem. Accurate building size is also important for accurate population estimates. You can use the shortcut shft+(-/+) to scale selected features after you shape them. --- Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167200860

All footpritns valid please remember to square or circularise them with q or o respectively. I resolved this in Changeset: 167223453. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Don't let the bad review discourage you. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167200980

I flagged footpritns which would either be more accurately mapped as square or should not be mapped as building footprins. Hope this helps.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167201003

All footprints represent buildings visible in imagery and the vast majority are quite accurate. I think the two that I flagged are actually square. well mapped overall --- Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167201073

The footprint I flagged erreoneously shares a common node with another. Hold alt to prevent your cursor from snapping to map data. Please watch the beginer mistakes videos on the missing maps youtube channel for a demo of this.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166429007

The footprint I flagged outlines 2 buildings.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166835338

Thanks for trying to accurately map the shape of features. Check to see if a simpler shape is a good fit for the shape of features before trying more complex ones. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166805008

You identified buildings visible in the imagery and appropriately shaped them but they are generally too large. Take more care when placing the nodes and/or use the shift+(-/+) shortcut to scale features after tagging and shaping them. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166864269

I think that the vast majortiy of footprnits added here do not likely represent buildings.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167157659