Hi ,
You can also use :
wikimedia_commons=File:Fs maandagmarkt.jpg

for this image , it's not wrong however to link to individual images using image tag, see wikimedia_commons=*

stands is ok , possibly rack a little bit more accurate but this is ok. looks good.

Hi Wegspotter,
Ik ben benieuwd hoe u het wegenregister gebruikt om OSM te controleren, ik zou er graag meer over weten. De reden is vooral omdat na diepe analyse van het Wegenregister blijkt dat er toch wel een groot aantal fouten in staan. OSM is de betere kaart en daarom moeten extra waakzaam zijn dat er geen fouten worden overgenomen. Kan je ons hier wat meer vertellen over hoe je te werk gaat. Er staan in deze changeset zoals GerdP ook aangeeft ook een aantal foute key/tag combinaties, waarschijnlijk een vergissing, maar wanneer ik dit gebied open in JOSM en simpelweg valideer krijg ik reeds een 10tal problemen te zien die via simpele validatie niet in OSM zou terrecht komen. Het zou me dus vooral interesseren om te weten te komen hoe jouw werkwijze in elkaar zit, hopelijk sta je open voor suggesties ook. Bedankt. Glenn

Hi Skyman,

I'm contacting you due to the fact that in the country wide statistics we noticed that you delete a lot. Checking you changesets we can see that you seem to be using GRB data to draw houses. I have a couple of remarks on this, first of all, it's not needed to add a postal code to the objects, this is taken care of by postal code boundaries (relations). The second one is that you seem to be interested in getting GRB data into OSM, which is fine but we have a project running that defines guidelines on how to do so : see osm.wiki/GRBimport
In fact, we'll be launching a tool relatively soon that will help us to do this properly . see osm.wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/GRB for more GRB information.

One of the things in our procedure is to not delete the existing buildings on favor of the GRB ones. You also delete the history of the building and most probably also loose existing tags. Since you use ID , your options are probably limited to be able to follow those guidelines. You should look into use JOSM with the Replace Geometries plugin, it will merge an existing building with a new one with 1 click.

You can find the core OSM community in our riot chat channel : https://riot.im/app/#/room/#osmbe:matrix.org

We would be happy to get you on board there. If you have any problems, issues. There's the place to discuss this. Thanks for your help and understanding.

Salut, nous ne voyons pas à quoi sert cette frontière? Ce n'est pas une frontière officielle. Vous faites beaucoup de travail inutile. Pouvez-vous s'il vous plaît expliquer vos objectifs? Nous allons probablement rétablir ce changeset.

"proposed" n'est même pas une valeur officielle pour cette type de "boundary".

Bien à vous.

Ok, thanks for your reply and your Russian addition. I've fixed it already. hope your application will get fixed soon as well. Greetings.

Hi,

Please don't add addr:postcode on place nodes , this is a useless practice ex:. node: 2428584430

Hi, I see you're tracing GRB buildings into the map. Our BE community noticed this and we wonder why you're doing so much effort, we have an import plan in the makings, and we already have some tools to assist (which include address data as well). We also believe you aren't really local to Brugge since you're using a german version of JOSM). We aren't really against your work, but its just basic geometries and default building=yes you're adding. It kind of looks better than nothing there but the amount of effort you're putting into this is probably not worth your time if later on we merge those with the official data. Just wondering. Thanks for reading this

This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 50736668, 50738065.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/50948088 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/50948088 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import

Correct zou zijn om geen details te wissen, een apart fietspad moet behouden worden.

Het is perfect ok om deze te laten staan naast uw bijkomende tags op de highways in kwestie die ik wel laat staan.

Janfi,

Waarom blijf je steeds cycleways wissen die ik opnieuw getekend heb nadat je die vroeger steeds bleef wissen ? Ik ben vrij geduldig en heb totaal geen zin in een editwar maar je blijft gewoon dingen wissen die correct zijn omdat je er een andere mening op nahoud. Kan je dit bespreken aub met de comunity ? graag op de mailing lijst en/of op het riot kanaal

Hallo,

De tags op buurtweg 75 zijn een beetje overdreven, bv als je lit=no zet maakt het geen verschil, omdat dit de standaard is, hetzelfde kan je bereiken met de tag weg te laten. Maar ook de access tags zijn een beetje in de mist aan het gaan, ik zal je werk verbeteren als voorbeeld.

I made a github comment addreses to you , I want to fix the mistakes I made but I need some help to get source data. Tx

Hi, while 'park' isn't exactly wrong, a nature_reserve (which it is) is more restricting to interpretation. It didn't really improve tagging either but I see why park would be a rational choice, let's keep it nature_reserve. In case you want to discuss, please join the be-talk mailing list. we are all there

nice catch. tx

The bridge isn't connected to any road, which kinda of makes it a non-issue, but usually we should tag these structures under construction as such, especially when attached to other roads, you might be routed over them if not. nice to see this fast edit work!

Dear pokemon player: in short: it does not work trying to create more respawns. You really need to stop or we'll have to deactivate your account and any other account associated with your personal details. It's not a threat but a warning that this will happen if you keep doing this

No, by all means, tx for raising this, I'm addicted to improving and structuring data and it flatters me you take the time to check my work. Excellent. It's all about improving it. Keep the issue open on github. I had a hard time finding streetname lists and that doc looked was better than anything I've seen (spelling wise it's quite accurate except accented letters). If such a list doesn't exist, I'll create it.