Hi there!
I've noticed the way
way/382773314
What did you try to map here?
The attribute ighway=crossing should be used
to mark nodes where pedestrians can cross a highway.
The area enclosed by the way is already mapped as landuse=residential
way/205342327
So I think these two tags should be removed.

Hi John!
What was meant with this way?
way/304466474
Is it still needed?

Hi there!
I've noticed that you've removed most ways tagged with highway=tour.
Just one remained:
way/368900732

Hi there!
I've noticed that you've mapped a gap
in the "Township Road" with tho nodes
highway=washout.
If this gap still exists:
Is this a kind of ford ? Or just erosion ?
And is the road still used ?

Hi there!
I've changed tow nodes with
highway=guidepost to
tourism=information,information=guidepost
node/3826983775
node/3826191662
See information=guidepost
OK?

hi there!
I've noticed that you used
highway=secondary_junction
instead of motorway_junction.
I've corrected this, see
changeset/35588296
and
highway=motorway_junction

Hallo Uli,
siehe http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Why-is-ford-yes-not-rendered-in-the-default-style-tt5861038.html
Ich bleib dran ...
ciao,
Gerd

Hi there!
I've changed the rarely used highway=gate to barrier=gate.
node/3857553257

Hi there!
I've changed the rarely used highway=gate to barrier=gate.
See
barrier=*

I've tried to correct it, see
changeset/35587799
OK?

Vergiss es, ich habe es jetzt selber gesehen,
dass highway=ford auf osm.org
ein Symbol bekommt, ford=yes aber nicht.
Werde mal nachfragen, warum das so ist.

Hi ulil,
ich sehe, dass Du immer noch highway=ford
anstelle von ford=yes verwendest. Kannst Du nochmal genauer erklären, wo die Darstellung von highway=ford "funtioniert" und die von ford=yes nicht?

Thanks for the feedback.
I suggest to add a corresponding note to the bridge element:
way/71830177

Hi there!
Please check, I've changed footpath to footway:
way/381474113

Hi there!
I've change a wrong highway tag and some other small problems, see
changeset/35579173

Most of the ways really don't need a layer tag. The tag is normally used for bridges or tunnels, when two ways are crossing. The layer attribute says which one is on top.

Auch interessant:
osm.wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren

Danke für die Rückmeldung.
Ich denke, dass das englische wiki recht klar ist: osm.wiki/DE:Bicycle
highway=path passt eigentlich immer, man muss halt mehr explizit angeben.
Ob etwas passend dargestellt wird sollte nachrangig sein, insbesondere, wenn es nicht um die Darstellung auf
osm.org geht.
Wichtiger aus meiner Sicht ist es, dass
die Angaben wie z.B. bicyle=designated/yes/no passen.

Thanks for the feedback :-)
See also
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Is-JOSM-responsible-for-tags-like-layer-Main-Street-tp5860983.html

Thanks for the feedback. It happens quite often with JOSM, maybe it is an error in the
editor. I've noticed that once: Clicked on name
and JOSM showed the lanes field, clicked on lanes and JOSM showed the name field. Unfortunately I was not able to reproduce it after a restart of JOSM.