Frank Peng's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 163820212 | about 20 hours ago | Please save and upload your changes in one area before moving on to another. |
| 163820212 | about 20 hours ago | Please save and upload you changes in one area before moving on to another. |
| 162891977 | about 20 hours ago | The oneway=yes tag on those highway carriageways has been restored in changeset/176158410. Please elaborate on why you tagged valid one-way roads as not one-way. |
| 173880795 | 1 day ago | Please don't tag motorway links that are actually one-way as not one way. Those motorway links or freeway ramps are clearly one-way. |
| 173883647 | 1 day ago | Why did you tag actual one-way motorway links as not one-way? Those are clearly one-way. Those errors you made have been corrected by another mapper. |
| 173928690 | 1 day ago | The alignment of the road you mapped (way/1445983866) is off from the actual alignment of the road seen in aerial imagery. The road curves going to the house, not going in a straight line. Please map and align roads going with the actual alignment of them seen on ground or aerial imagery. |
| 174150337 | 1 day ago | What do you mean that you "gated" this driveway? You just changed this service road to a driveway. |
| 174510040 | 1 day ago | Why did you change the direction of those one-way roads as going the opposite direction of the actual one-way restriction of those roads on the ground? You don't want to make routing software direct drivers to go on the wrong side of a divided road or go the wrong way on a one-way road. That error you made on OSM could potentially put lives at risk, cause accidents, and cause drivers to be stopped by police for going the wrong way. The United States drives on the right-hand side of the road, not the left-hand side. Many data consumers use OSM data for their maps or routing software, and they rely on the data to be correct in order for routing to be correct and accurate. So don't mess up the map data for data consumers.
Also, you deleted the gate nodes from those roads. I can clearly see in Bing Streetside images from 2014 and 2022 that the gates are clearly there. Did those gates get removed recently? What is the source for the removal of the gates? |
| 173929308 | 1 day ago | In this changeset, you glued several roads to a suburb boundary. Please don't glue roads to administrative or suburb boundaries. |
| 171359176 | 2 days ago | I changed this residential road to a service road in changeset/176078354 |
| 168962553 | 3 days ago | Those overclassified roads around this school have been downgraded in changeset/176072651. Those roads don't need to be tagged as unclassified roads. |
| 168962611 | 3 days ago | Partially reverted in changeset/176072478 |
| 168962241 | 3 days ago | I downgraded those unclassified roads around this school to service roads and parking aisles in changeset/176071866. Please elaborate on why you changed valid service roads and driveways around schools to unclassified roads. |
| 173291613 | 3 days ago | This borough/suburb relation that you broke in this changeset has been fixed in changeset/174636140. Would you care to explain what motivated this change? |
| 173929308 | 3 days ago | Also, please don't glue roads to suburb or administrative boundaries. If a mapper adjusts the alignment of a road and it's connected to an administrative or suburb boundary, it would move the boundary along with the road, causing the boundary to be messed up or distorted. Please don't just auto-accept the suggested fixes by the iD editor. You also added a crossing to where there isn't actually a crossing: node/13267041562 |
| 173929308 | 3 days ago | Please see changeset/174636140 |
| 174652113 | 3 days ago | This incorrect map edit has been fixed in changeset/174702103. Please do not change valid suburb boundaries into roads. This is not acceptable on OSM, and it damages the map. |
| 162393354 | 3 days ago | Partially reverted in changeset/176055918 |
| 176052007 | 3 days ago | What is the source for the addition of this apartment building? Aerial imagery of this location shows no apartment building here. Did this apartment building recently get built here? |
| 176006273 | 4 days ago | Thanks for the fix. I split the South Mullen Road way (way/18393395) at the point where both directions of the road divide approaching the roundabout, so the section of the road from the roundabout to where both directions of the road meet is one-way. I also corrected the direction of a couple of other roads here by splitting the ways at the point where both directions of the roads divide approaching the roundabout and tagging the non-one-way sections of the roads as oneway=no. See changeset/176028517 |