Alright thank you for letting me know

For example, Interstate 5 in northern Los Angeles County permits bikes on it.

Also Interstate standards are not freeway standards. Freeway standards only require separate grade access and a divided highway, while Interstates require more.

Freeways do permit bikes on them. In California by default bikes are allowed on freeways unless otherwise signed. See Cal. Vehicle Code section 21960. The part north of Kearny Mesa Road could be argued as not a freeway, but the rest of the road clearly is a freeway, w/ multiple sources listing it as such.

Alright thank you for letting me know

Thats what the definition may say but official state maps show otherwise. See https://postmile.dot.ca.gov/PMQT/PostmileQueryTool.html? (Make sure to check the "View County Boundaries, Routes, and Calibration Postmiles" box in the top left corner). This goes back to the founding of California and its counties where the state would define a boundary and the counties would survey that boundary to a substantial degree but did not care if it was exactly accurate. Hell Los Angeles and Ventura Counties cared so little at one point that they surveyed the boundry 16 miles from where it was supposed to be. See the following book: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:California_County_Boundaries.pdf

Huh I swore there were signs stating that this segment was designated a freeway but the route concept report now says otherwise. Ill change this back to a trunk. Thanks for letting me know about this and my bad for this error.

I'll change such to be a motorway except for the portion adjacent to Shippee due to it being designated as a freeway per cahighways.org/145-152.html#149

I added them since there is a lane, as indicated by the dashed white line, for exiting vehicles to use to enter and exit.

Yes you're correct it should be the same on either side. My bad for creating this error.

I was using bing and no I havn't done the survey but thank you for bringing this up to my attention and I'll make sure to check it out :)

Alright thanks for letting me know.

Alright thank you for letting me know. I'll make sure to be much more conservative with my "trunk" edits. Thank you!

No and I havnt been able to find any other sources to it so ill be removing it my bad.

I don't have a link to it but it is on the April 2002 CTC Agenda as Item 2.2a.(2)

Ah thats a mistake thank you for letting me know Ill get onto it :)

welp im stupid for missing that ill revert that asap :/.

My bad I meant section 561 and the second link should be the following:
http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=561&lawCode=SHC

~~Thank you for informing me of the aforementioned!

If no one has by then I’ll make those changes that you just mentioned. However those “Freeway Entrance” and “Toll Road Entrance” signs are just a Caltrans/state of California thing. Local freeways usually do no have those signs (such as the freeway portion of Jamboree Road, which is not under the jurisdiction of Caltrans as defined in Sections 90 & 461 of the Streets and Highways Code, in Tustin and Irvine none of the ramps or main road have “Freeway Entrance” signs)

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=90&lawCode=SHC

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=461&lawCode=SHC

Bicycles are definitely allowed on certain freeways. in California by default bicycles are allowed on freeways unless the department that controls the freeway erects signs that state the bicycles are not allowed. See http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=21960&lawCode=VEH

and

https://web.archive.org/web/20190514231411/https://dot.ca.gov/hq/paffairs/faq/faq67.htm