Fluffy89502's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 96444592 | almost 5 years ago | Can you please explain what your intentions are or what you are trying to do? I cannot tell if you are trying to remove these landuse features but it seems that you are trying to since when you edit these tags you leave the scrub relations unclosed and thus essentially deleting the feature since unclosed relation will not appear on the map. |
| 94661420 | about 5 years ago | this isnt a freeway brotherman |
| 92495957 | about 5 years ago | Yes. My bad about forgetting about this. |
| 92484545 | about 5 years ago | I understand your reasoning but that has nothing to do with the significance of the road right? Without the 395 Mono County would be deserted. |
| 92484545 | about 5 years ago | Can you explain your reasoning? I don't understand what you mean by "this region generally uses trunk to mean expressway." Who is "this region?" Anyways, the wiki definition clearly indicates that his is eligible to be designated as a trunk as it is not paralleled by an interstate and is a major route for the Owens Valley and high desert. |
| 92436292 | about 5 years ago | I covered it with the wood tag since the area is still relatively wooded. if you think that that is inappropriate I can undo such edits. |
| 90432180 | about 5 years ago | Sorry for my irresponsibility. I’ll make sure to execute what you stated if I edit again. |
| 90467627 | about 5 years ago | Sorry about that. Will do in the future. |
| 88278035 | about 5 years ago | My apologies. I was using an older definition on the wiki from months ago. I made edits upgrading similar roads to trunk roads and they were all reverted because they did not meet the standards of the time. When editing this, I failed to check the definitions for any updates. If there are any inconsistencies, among other things, that is why. I am very sorry. |
| 90330256 | over 5 years ago | |
| 88883518 | over 5 years ago | You know these roads are private right? Not anybody can drive through these roads nor do traffic laws within the California Vehicle Code aplly on these roads. They are owned by a HOA and can trespass anybody from the roads. Please stop changing these roads from private. |
| 89325898 | over 5 years ago | Yeah I agree that landcover does not follow borders like that but it takes a lot of time to follow natural boundaries, and as such this is a work in progess. I do not know how to edit along natural lines all at once. You can clearly see that in the north-east park of the wood I have spent time following natural lines while I am yet to get to it in the north-west portion of the same. |
| 89376847 | over 5 years ago | I don't see anything else within the area. Let me know if you see any other land/biomes because i cannot. |
| 89112940 | over 5 years ago | I have no clue. I honestly do not know how that tag was created or added. |
| 86532897 | over 5 years ago | From what I understood is that I could use things like census boundaries to constittute marking such as a survey |
| 86532897 | over 5 years ago | Here it states that the counties have water boundaries: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_counties_in_Michigan |
| 86532897 | over 5 years ago | Just because a sheriff is elected in one county does not mean that their powers do not extend throughout the entire state. Also the attorney general does not prosecute crimes that occur within the lakes as the county district attorneys do that. Also see the water area of the counties, such as those listed here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Buren_County%2C_Michigan |
| 82259252 | over 5 years ago | I must have indicated that that road is one way on accident. My apologies. |
| 81664797 | over 5 years ago | I don't remove them it is done automatically my apologies |
| 78442199 | almost 6 years ago | Marking that as an emergency access road was an accident. Thank you for catching that error. |