OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
171642928 3 months ago

Hi Nona,
Sorry, I'm confused because I don't find what to change.

For example way/1309300369
and way/163876398 are "trunk" not "secondary".

Please, can you make correction, and I promess you to not change these classification in future.

171642928 3 months ago

Revert done.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Please feel free to correct me again :-)

171642928 3 months ago

Hi Nona
I understand that the official classification is not the user prefrered.
I'll do the revert.

171644053 3 months ago

J'avais résisté à ce type de modif depuis des mois, et je n'ai pas tenu aujourd'hui :-)
J'essaye de m'en souvenir pour la suite.
Bien à toi.

171644053 3 months ago

Je viens de remettre "primary" sur Casablanca pour RR320 et RR322 : changeset/171646607

171644053 3 months ago

Bonjour Ilias.
Je n'aurais pas dû toucher à cette classification. Je vais annuler mes modifs.

168041470 6 months ago

Réparé.

Il faut que je me méfie plus des vues aériennes :-)

168041470 6 months ago

Argh!! Mince, j'ai fait une bétise alors... Je répare de suite.

160831353 6 months ago

And the way is a Provincial road with "ref=RP7023" so it should be "highway=tertiary" not primary. Don't you think ?

160831353 6 months ago

Hi Nona

I know you have fresher imagery than us so I try to not touch your work.

But I think there is error here with some "lanes=4", on 2 ways it makes 8 lanes :-)

Tanks & regards

167012661 6 months ago

Hi @Amineee_

Your changes are strange, because there already is the RP4025 passing under the bridge. Why a new construction few meters east ?

screenshot (available 45 days) : https://drop.infini.fr/r/R7Vn9gJbUX#q/RVm5278+SpUmBW5FJ1YWYSbzgP5LX54j3zq5e+to8=

Regards & cheers
Cyrille37

166553384 7 months ago

Hi Nona
Like I'm a bit confused, I continue the discussion via osm messaging system ;-)

166553384 7 months ago

Also, to refine the tagging schema:
- for the new RP6105
- In CNER SHP the "ordreArc=11" is tagged as "etat=-1" that should be tagged as "proposed" in OSM
- But the way "highway=track" exists in OSM

Do you have an idea on how should I tag it to keep the way as "highway=track" and add the "proposed" official reference "ref=RP6105" ?

sorry if I'm too picky ;-)

166553384 7 months ago

Hi Nona,
I've made change to way/1388446223 and relation/1827491
Can you check if I well understood your proposition.
Thanks

166553384 7 months ago

Hi Nona

You are right.

Can you tell me how I have to tag to make a road available to use but not as an "easy" road ? Like it is a "piste" but official status is "primary", "secondary" or "tertiary" ?

I had made such tagging that I will correct when I will know the right way.

Thanks for your helpful comments which help me :-)

166553384 7 months ago

Hi
I have tagged the "ref=RN4" as a "highway=track + proposed=primary" but @Amineee__ changed it to "highway=primary".

My source are
- ESRI imagery (public version in JOSM)
- and the 2025 update from CNER https://map.comptoir.net/maroc-reseau-routier-2025-01/

166372342 7 months ago

I'm happy to read you. The roads network update is a big challenge :-)

166372342 7 months ago

L'ATLAS A3 en PDF est dispo sur la page dédiée: https://map.comptoir.net/maroc-reseau-routier-2025-01/

166372342 7 months ago

Hi @osm10005

Indeed, the CNER give us, via talk-ma@, a 2024 update as a reference for 2025.

We can talk about in the discussion cited by @ilias.

Thanks & cheers
Cyrille37

166102806 7 months ago

Thanks Aya for your explanation, I modify my Q&A script & data to match your correction.
And no problem for the delay :-)
Cheers.
Cyrille37.