All rails removed have been fully built over by new roads, parking lots and buildings.

These features do not exist (at least anymore).

If they existed at one point in time, they should be drawn on OHM since they no longer exist and no trace can be found on the ground.

Only railways that have been long replaced by buildings, roads and parking lots were removed. segments obscured by foliage were left.

It seems someone is adding these non-existent railways back to OSM.

Some of it appears to be done by user:zluuzki

These rails go through houses and across roads. It is clear they do not exist. In addition, local survey in several areas confirm that they have been replaced by trails and do not in fact exist as an abandoned or razed railway as there is NO trace of what potentially existed at some point in time.

These features should be moved to OHM instead.

These rails all go through bedrooms and/or roads where there are clearly no rails going across the pavement.

These rails do NOT exist and thus should not be mapped.

Thanks for catching and verifying.

I have gone ahead and cited the source/image and added the name in spanish as well.

Is there a reason why you gave all of the houses a name with their street address?

This edit was manually reverted due to improper tagging and naming of nodes, inconsistent with OSM guidelines.

addressed private land use tags.

Also removed runway based on new satellite imagery, updated taxiways and other building infrastructure and touched up some other features to increase details on the map.

@HubMiner

Looks like this will never be built. Want to go ahead and delete it? Thanks!

Close, but it is a duplicate add. Node and building should be merged, or there should be either a building OR a node, but not both.

Personally, I think building is the better path if it is the only business in the building.

Everything in this edit looks good! Feel free to contribute more in the future!

:D

Reviewing. Looks good, however the "H" in hills, the "G" in golf, and the "C" in Club should all be capitalized.

Also, welcome to OSM! Easiest way to contribute and get involved is by using an app called StreetComplete! Let me know if you have any questions.

Is there a reason you added bridge areas where no bridge exists?

*It is correct, surprisingly.*

It is correct, unsurprisingly. In New Jersey, most highway and freeways are unlit. Only place they are lit are generally intersections and/or "in town".

Ugh, so close. I thought it was vacant, but yeah, should be disused. You are correct, I agree with you.

Thanks for catching my error, explaining and correcting.

No problem! I try to tackle the latest notes, killing off the easy ones or spam ones, then addressing easy ones and then going through to get the other ones in that area.

Soon, we shall have a lot less open notes. And by soon, I mean years, and by less I mean, maybe 3k less. Lol.

I wasn't sure if you were going to add these or leave them open like others. There was nothing in the notes to imply you were going to add them. My apologies, I have no problem just ignoring your notes in the future.

Luckily, you are more than welcome to add additional details. It isn't like I missed any info that was in the notes. All the info that was added is now on the map. You can definitely flesh it out and add whatever info that you want to add that was not in the note. nothing wrong with that.

Should be Iowa. Good catch - state=IA

updated.