Hello, and welcome to OSM. This changeset has been reverted. On OpenStreetMaps, we do not delete features just because access it private or restricted. Instead, we use access tags to denote that it is not publicly accessible. This is to prevent people from readding it with public tags, and then just having to have it deleted and reinstated.

You can read more on why deletion is not the answer here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

You can read about access tag definitions here:
access=*

changeset/149334834

Hello, and welcome to OSM. This changeset has been reverted. On OpenStreetMaps, we do not delete features just because access it private or restricted. Instead, we use access tags to denote that it is not publicly accessible. This is to prevent people from readding it with public tags, and then just having to have it deleted and reinstated.

You can read more on why deletion is not the answer here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

You can read about access tag definitions here:
access=*

changeset/149334834

Thanks ablevi202! I know, MPs are tricky. But once you get the hang of them, they are pretty natural.

I think this edit looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149278751

Individual trees should not be mapped as a circular area and tagged as woods. Individual nodes should be used for individual trees.

I have gone through and cleaned this up for you.

I concur with the classification and tag change. They should be driveways and not residential roads.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149260264

I have gone through and removed the other edits by the user who added this fake park. :)

Thanks again!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149249294

removed
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131790915

Reverted
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133309633

Do not change cemeteries to a park when it is clearly incorrect.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133309649

This is not a park, and has been removed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133632824

This is not a park, and has been removed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133633058

This isn't a park.

This isn't a park.

Welcome to OSM! I concur that this is not a park. Thank you for your edit.

It was likely added for Pokemon go.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149249294

Welcome to OSM! I concur that this is not a park. Thank you for your edit.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149249336

When adding buildings, "Q" can be used to square the corners.

Descriptive names should not be used for the cartpaths.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149245878

I know I have commented on your changesets for this before. Do not delete features just to re-add them...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149200411

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. As stated previously, this path is visible on aerial imagery. To prevent it from being readded with incorrect access tags, it should remain mapped but with access=private tag(s). I already updated the access tags for you.

changeset/149200909

**Actually cleaned up golf course.