When mapping, please do not overlap areas.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149157238

Don't add descriptive names to features. Only official names should be added. You can read more here:

osm.wiki/Names

I went ahead and removed the names for you here.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149153636

Don't add descriptive names to features. Only official names should be added. You can read more here:

osm.wiki/Names
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149152634

Don't add descriptive names to features. Only official names should be added. You can read more here:

osm.wiki/Names

Do not partially overlap land areas. I encourage you to read up on common mapping pitfalls:
leisure=golf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*

I have gone through and cleaned up this edit for you.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149150344

Do not partially overlap land areas. I encourage you to read up on common mapping pitfalls:
leisure=golf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*

I have gone through and cleaned up this edit for you.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149151704

Do not "lollipop" areas to simulate a hole. I have gone through and cleaned up this course for you.

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. Access tags should be used instead for "private" driveways, rather than straight up deletion. You can read more why deletion is not the answer here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/149108605

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. Access tags should be used instead for "private" driveways, rather than straight up deletion. You can read more why deletion is not the answer here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/149108605

This changeset has been reverted in part or full. Access tags should be used instead for "private" driveways, rather than straight up deletion. You can read more why deletion is not the answer here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

changeset/149108605

It was already tagged as a driveway, not a residential road. Deletion is not the answer, and you can read why here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Access tags should be used instead.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149107980

Instead of abstract art with a bunch of pieces to try and simulate holes, you should just use multipolygon relations. trust me, it is so much easier, plus it would be of higher quality.

The paths that go over water should be mapped with bridge tags, as appropriate.

Do not delete just to readd the features...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149072766

Is "Public Fishing Access - Easement of Private Property" the actual name? It appears descriptive and unlikely to be signed as such.

Do not partially overlap areas, such as the green and fiarway.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148994419

Do not partially overlap areas, such as the green and fiarway.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148994419

Multipolygon relations should be used instead of this abstract art of areas to try and create "holes" in an area.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148955837

Please do not delete features just to remap them, especially when they were mapped better before you tried to redraw them.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148938913

They are continuing to delete and readd.

https://osmcha.org/changesets/146032152
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145801673