Please use better changeset comments. What exactly did you do?

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Please use better changeset comments. What exactly did you do?

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Please use better changeset comments. What exactly did you do?

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Please use better changeset comments. What exactly did you do?

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Please use better changeset comments. What exactly did you do?

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Please map it how it is, and not how you need/want it for a game. This database is for legitimate uses and not video games.

Is there a reason you deleted all these golf course holes?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132029327

Same thing here and for the rest of your edits. The Tee, Green, Fairway, etc. should not be named, especially if they are descriptive names. i have gone through and removed the names accordingly.

The fairways and other features should not be named. Additionally, the hole number tag should just be a number like "12"

Ran across a "proposed" roadway where the source website doesn't exist anymore. I don't see any construction in imagery. Is there still intention for this way to be built?

way/534221945

Or should the proposed roadway be cleaned up?

Is there still a driveway out to S. River Road?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132235135

Private roads should still be mapped. The access tags should be restricted. Having private roads on the map is helpful for emergency responders.

therefore, this changeset will be reverted and the correct tags will be added instead.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132070676

Non-existent "demolished" roadways were also removed.

Wow, some of these buildings are way off.

Ugh, RapID is a mess sometimes. Would you be able to clean some of the low quality outlines and additions up?

Building outlines look good. FYI, you can square buildings by pressing "q" on the keyboard. This will snap the angles to 90 degrees after putting the areas in.

Keep up the good work!

What source did you use for the College Boulevard extension/new road? What is the timeline for this section to be constructed?

What source do you have for this new road?

What source do you have for the proposed Nardo Street?

There is not physical evidence everywhere. Who knows, it could have been an old road, or a power line, which would show up similarly. You can't prove any of it is correct as, again, there is no ground truth since nothing physical exists.

And again, any feature without a physical, verififiable presence is not good practice and is out scope for OSM.

And again, because this is being added for historical reasons, it should just be added to OHM, not OSM.

Ah, got it. Thanks for clarifying!