You can keep only the official moh name in the name tag. Using dual language in the name tag with a dash is not standard. I'll fix it. Thanks for adding moh names!

Please do not "try" stuff on openstretmap. There is no hospital there. I will revert your change.

You're right it is the whole building. Not a big problem, it is just that in this area, we separated 100% of the POIs from their building for consistency. I changed it back to a node just for this reason. Thanks for updating the data though!

Please keep POIs separate from buildings when possible. It makes updates easier and it makes it possible to add multiple POIs inside a single building. It also helps having the POIs near their entrance. Thanks!

Yes I know, sorry. This is the change that has been made:
change [crossing=uncontrolled] with [crossing:markings=no] to [crossing=unmarked] (removed crossing:markings)

Yes automated edit to follow the new approved wiki page on crossing:markings and uncontrolled/unmarked crossings. Should be fine though. Did it trigger an error or something?

Hi! I am not sure I understand what you were trying to do with this edit. You move sidewalks all around and misaligned them. The correct alignment for Bing Maps is 0.6,-1.54
I will have to revert most of your edits. Thanks for your understanding.

Please do not add survey metadata. Or at least do not use landuse tags to map them. Thanks!

Sorry, did not see that the commercial are was not from you. Forget the previous message!

Please do not add landuse area on top of roads. They must be separated. Also, it seems you are doing an analysis. Please explain what was the goal of adding this data?

No problem, thanks!

This segment should be 4 lanes (2 forward, 2 backward) since the transition starts at the beginning (see width:lanes)

There are 3 lanes there indeed. Fixed it.

Finally reverted this changeset that added fantasy map data... hard work. I wish this user could stop creating new accounts over and over again...

You need to put sources for proposed or construction data. Where do you get this information?

:-)

Bonjour! Prière de ne pas retirer les sections placement=transition lorsqu'il y a des voies de jonctions. Aussi, la jonction des voies directionelles vers une voie bi-directionnelle devrait se faire au "gore" théorique, c'est-à-dire là ou le triangle de peinture commence. J'ai corrigé le tout. Les photos aérienne de Bing à cet endroit datent de 2020, alors que les photos de Géodésie Québec datent de l'automne 2021, alors j'ai pris ces dernières pour corriger.

Merci d'avoir ajouté les noms de rues.

There is only 3 lanes here. Please validate onsite before changing data. Thanks!

Hi! Please do not remove sidewalk=separate when the sidewalks are drawn separately. sidewalk=both and separated sidewalks is duplicate information and will make routing engines route pedestrian on the street instead of sidewalks. I will fix them, but please make sure to check for separated sidewalks next time. Thanks and have a nice day!

J'ai ajouté les tags lcn=yes aux traverses Bouthillier/Sanche.