I fixed it already, you can see the changes by reloading the editor. The kerb is lowered for driveways but is raised between them and has a concrete separator.

I fixed it already, you can see the changes by reloading the editor. The kerb is lowered for driveways but is raised between them and has a concrete separator.

Perfect thanks

Hi!

There is a kerb there separating the road from the cycling path. Please read osm.wiki/Canada#Mapping_cycleways

Thanks!

Is there a reason why these entrances were changed? In the Montreal area, the home;main entrances are entrances to elderly centres, which includes offices, shops and homes, hence the dual entrance tag.

The issue is for routing. This intersection is easy to cross late at night or on weekends when traffic is low and it is always legal. The fact that it would be impracticable on rush hour should be specified in other tools, outside of OSM. Removing these kind of crossings would break routing all over Quebec since it would not allow pedestrian to cross in most villages and towns or in rural area too. I would suggest to keep them active and use another tool to specify if it is dangerous or difficult to use during some periods of the day. I understand that the wiki is saying that there should be a kerb or something to specify it is a valid crossing, though unmarked, but in that case, it would make pedestrian routing completely unrealistic. Some municipalities in Quebec have long stretches of roads without any kerb but with sidewalks on both sides and multiple unmarked intersections. Removing the unmarked crossings would make routing unusable for pedestrians.

Hi! Can you add a source to that info? The community decided some time ago to call the REM a light rail system. Changing it to subway should be discussed with the community on https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/ca/95

Not sure, this is a public secondary school and it is accessible to the public outside school hours. However, right now, this school is under heavy renovations

ok, je vais mettre bicycle=dismount
Merci!

Comme on avait discuté, ce sont des liens pour permettre aux vélos d'accéder aux parcs. C'est pour ça que j'avais retiré cycleway=crossing et remplacé par footway=crossing

OK, no problem. In the wiki, it says access=yes is implicit, but can be added for more precise information. Thanks!

I think access=yes is implicit. Did StreetComplete complained this was needed?

Ok, I see the sidewalk was added with bicycle=dismount. So the tag on the road should be bicycle=use_sidepath ?

Are you sure bicycle are not permitted there with a no bicycle sign? How do cyclists access the funeral home and the large factory there?

Au plaisir!

Si les piétons sont désignés dans la voie cyclable, on met sidewalk:right=shared
et sidewalk:left=no
Je m'en occupe

Si il n'y a pas de séparation physique comme des bollards fixes ou un muret de béton, on tag sur la rue avec cycleway:right=lane
Des flex-post (bollars flexibles), on considère comme aucune séparation physique car ils sont souvent retirés l'hiver et des fois, ils sont réinstallés seulement tard au printemps/été ou complètement oubliés. Voir ce wiki: osm.wiki/Canada#Mapping_cycleways

Oubliez-ça, c'était 70 et ça baisse à 60. Parfait!

merci pour la mise à jour. Êtes-vous certain/e du 60 km/h? Il me semble que Laval avait abaissé toutes ses limites de 60 à 50, 50 à 40 et 40 à 30.

These were added for a resaon: some old routing engines still do not map them as oneway, so for backward compatibility, we still add the oneway tag. Can you cancel the removal please?