I understand that it is dangerous to cross there, but it is legal, since it is an intersection and there is no sign prohibiting foot traffic. I think we should add back the unmarked crossings.

Foot is not forbidden here. I will update as non segregated foot

Bonjour! Cette piste devrait être insérée sur le segment de rue, car il n'y a pas de séparation physique à part des bollards amovibles. Voir le wiki ici: osm.wiki/Canada#Mapping_cycleways

Je vais la retirer et l'ajouter à la rue. Merci!

Hi! There was a note on the small segment with foot access on the cycling path: "Please keep foot access for the bus stop". We need to allow foot access so people can reach the bus stop on the east side of Rue de la Commune. I will put the foot access back.

Hi! Alignment was perfect before this changeset. Please do not realign unless you use official geodesic data to verify. Thanks! I will revert the changeset.

Hi! please note that bing and mapbox aerial imagery are not aligned correctly. The alignment was correct before, using official geodesic data from Géodésie Québec.

OK, I see. I removed the N/S direction already. You can add the source to your changeset or to the street itself like source: ADM (Aéroport de Montréal) The N/S directions come from Google I think and Google data cannot be used as source for OSM and in that case I think it is just old data.

Hi! Can you specify the source for this? There is no sign at this intersection.

Bonjour! Merci pour vos ajouts! Pour le nombre de voies, utilisez mettre un nombre entier. Pour spécifier la largeur, utilisez plutôt le tag width.

Merci!

Je vais devoir reverter. Vous avez ajouté une ligne par-dessus la ligne existante, ce qui crée une duplication erronée.

Pourriez-vous expliquer l'objectif? Il n'y a pas de prolongemnet de la ligne verte prévu. Les données d'OpenStreetMap doivent rester réelles et non fictives.

Yes, that would be better. Thanks!

Bonjour!

Juste une vérification: vous avez mis les tags vélo sur le trottoir, qui est interdit aux vélos. Les tags cycleway doivent aller dans la rue. Je corrige. Merci!

I updated these already.

Hi! Thanks for the updates. However, can you use bicycle=dismount instead of bicycle=no? Otherwise it would mean you can't even bring the bike dismounted in the park for some routing engines, which would break precise destination routing to parks and public spaces.

Thanks for the updates!

Can you keep the little crossing segments for bicycle access? Some routing engines for bicycle would not be able to reach parks otherwise. Thanks!

See this screenshot for an example of removed segments that should have been kept for bicycle routing:
https://ibb.co/zWvB8sWy

Hi! Can you explain the rationale for this change? What is the source of the change? Also, please add meaningful changeset messages. Thanks!

Also, you removed bicycle connectors (small segments to make sur bicycle can access the footpaths to the train station and park there (using bicycle=dismount footways)

In Quebec, it is legal to cross the street at any intersection, except when there is a no pedestrian sign. There are none here, so I will need to revert. The fact that it is dangerous or not is not taken into account unfortunately in osm for now and is the respondibility of other tools. Thanks!

The small segment on Avenue des Bois in Laval should indeed be placement=left_of:3 aligned with geodesic data. I fixed it.