Don't abbreviate refs or names.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144777161

Should probably be "Historic" and not "HIST"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144776820

Well, for example, on the north junction, both the onramp and the offramp had tags for forward and backwards lanes despite being oneway.

Smaller edits with descriptive changeset notes would be appreciated.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144641946

name= should probably be description= instead.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144640805

Less intentionally bad edits would go along way to endearing yourself to the locals.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144612074

Not quite how to fix this... Layer=-1 is below ground. No layer tag is necessary here, just split the way where it enters and leaves the building, the inside part gets tagged tunnel=building_passage
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144598773

Probably a good idea to be mindful of placement=*, lanes=* and *:lanes=* tags, a lot of stuff was pretty nonsensical here.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124321632

Where are you getting these names from?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144490938

Doesn't look like the actual route relation got updated. Also did the signs change at all?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136036545

These buildings don't match the shape on the ground at all... please use more care in the future.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115232843

That said, geometry could use work. Neatness counts.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144327351

"made bounding box" is unnecessary information, that's automatic every changeset as it's just the maximum extents of your edits.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144327351

Could you revisit this and make sure all of these actually line up with what's on the ground? I see multiple buildings that don't match. We shouldn't be blind-importing what's in MapWithAI without adjusting it when it doesn't line up.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144320518

Could you revisit this and make sure all of these actually line up with what's on the ground? I see multiple buildings that don't match. We shouldn't be blind-importing what's in MapWithAI without adjusting it when it doesn't line up.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144320559

Could you revisit this and make sure all of these actually line up with what's on the ground? I see multiple buildings that don't match. We shouldn't be blind-importing what's in MapWithAI without adjusting it when it doesn't line up.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144320618

Could you revisit this and make sure all of these actually line up with what's on the ground? I see multiple buildings that don't match. We shouldn't be blind-importing what's in MapWithAI without adjusting it when it doesn't line up.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144320680

Could you revisit this, please? It appears you're blind importing building suggestions without actually ensuring that they match the actual geometry on the ground.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144321031

A building made up of right angles and rectangles should be a pretty easy draw...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144307851

That's a ref, not a name. Have confirmed on the ground this change isn't accurate.