Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

First, is there a physical presence of the company here? Can the public visit? Is it an office? Is it an online business?

Features added to OSM must be verifiable as per OSM guidance:- osm.wiki/Verifiability

Also none of your tags are presented as required by the OSM database.

Thus I think your duplicated POI should be removed or amended

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You inadvertently dragged a solar panel 300m and joined it to a fence.
I've restored its position.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I wonder how anyone would get to this parking spot as there's no path or track to it? Please take note that only genuine verifiable features should be added to the OSM database. Do you need help removing the POI?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed the single node you uploaded to OSM as being untagged it has no meaning. Do you need help with anything?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I see you've inadvertently mapped the gate as a linear feature, a line between and joined to a footpath and a residential highway. If the gate is a barrier to either the path or the road it ought to be a node placed on the relevant feature and tagged barrier=gate. Could you amend please? Need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Pub and club updated, please tweak if needed. Regards Bernard.

No response so I've amended.

No response so I've amended.

Hi Richard,

If there is not a physical feature here as per the guidance in the wiki then it should not be added to OSM.

I don't use Strava but I know that folk upload routes including waypoints directly to Strava, please see here:- https://support.strava.com/hc/en-us/articles/216918387-Routes-on-Web These routes are then drawn on top of an OSM base map within the Strava app, thus not affecting the OSM database.

Strava does advise that you can correct, amend or add to OSM but this must be done to OSMs guidelines. Please don't add anything like personal or temporary data.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OenStreetMap.

Is there something physical here that others can verify as per the guidance here:- osm.wiki/Verifiability

Regards Bernard.

Ah now I see, map the building as pub/bar with address. Then add the address of the venue/club to the POI with the website address. Need any help please just ask.

I was never able to drink and run. Stumbled a few times after a drink.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
A rule of OSM is that features added to the database must be verifiable osm.wiki/Verifiability Thus if I can't gain knowledge of the sport feature on a visit here then the feature shouldn't be mapped to OSM. So should it be mapped?

REgards Bernard.

Hi,
Your changeset comment doesn't seem correct. I've unjoined the path from the boundary line. The footpath is a PRoW, I've tagged it as such and removed the permissive tag. There were FP signs at both ends.

Regards Benard.

Hi, This is a driveway so there must be access to it. I've removed the no access tag.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You inadvertently dragged a fence node from its correct position. I've replaced it to the original position.

If you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The duplicated sections do confuse routing so I'd agree with combining these highways onto the single original path track lines. I've done this and added tags to show the foot/cycle use and the incline and surface tags.

I hope it's all OK, please check.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OenStreetMap.

A couple of things to note. The Maxar imagery, selected from the right side background settings of the iD editor has a slightly later depiction and might be better.

If the roads are now open to the public then the tag construction=residential should be removed as well as your amending of the highway tag.

You might like to amend/redraw the outlines of the construction and residential areas to reflect current use.

Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that the highways you amended here are in part duplicating, (on top of) each other. Path, Way: 216882406 and cycleway Way: 769459075 zig-zag over each other and are in part joined. The cycleway Way: 769459075 then continues zig-zaging over and joining to track Way: 170419116.

Could you have a look at this please, need any help just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed the duplicated road and footpath.

Regards Bernard

Hi, Is the building really named Building?