OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
120248645 over 3 years ago

Hi, the tags would then be access=agricultural, barrier=gate. I've amended it.

Regards Bernard.

120248547 over 3 years ago

Hi, The tag is access=agricultural. I've amended it.

Regards Bernard.

120248452 over 3 years ago

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Yes, this is a public footpath, FP 006. This section of the public footpath is on an agricultural access way, highway=track. A public footpath can be on a track, it's not unusual, indeed the south end of this public footpath is on a service highway.

I've reinstated the track tag and added prowrefs.

Regards Bernard.

120129614 over 3 years ago

Hi, I've removed the duplicate highway, path on top of track to the south. Doesn't that path cross over the track to exit onto Somerford Keynes Road directly?

Regards Bernard.

120170465 over 3 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
You placed your info for number 29 on the overall landuse area. I've removed the data and placed it on what I think is the correct house. Please check.

Regards Bernard.

119827724 over 3 years ago

No response so removed.

119991839 over 3 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

No need for the extra park POI, the name is on the park outline. I've made a few tweaks and squared up things.

Regards Bernard.

119937256 over 3 years ago

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Sorry to say that you have drawn many duplicated highways here which I've removed.

Please be advised that if a highway needs to be amended/corrected then correction should be done to the existing highway. It is not correct to draw a new highway on top of another nor to delete a highway and draw a new one. The reasoning is to keep all history associated with a highway. Duplication of highways also seriously disrupts routing.

Regards Bernard.

119952549 over 3 years ago

Hello Mantas,

I can see on the Bing imagery shadows of two barriers to the west end of Old Coal Yard. One looks like a swing barrier the other looks like a full gate, I've added them to OSM, Node: -101856 and Node: 94930077. I've tagged the first one access=no
barrier=swing_gate
bicycle=yes
foot=yes
motor_vehicle=no
Thus allowing foot and cycle access to the cycleway. At the full gate I can't tell what access is allowed.

Regards Bernard.

119952549 over 3 years ago

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've tried to restore the features you've deleted/amended, This is because you inadvertently removed part of a cycleway. Also joined a bridge layer=1 to a railway line layer=-2. The removed road is still an on-the-ground feature and if needed should be properly amended/corrected not merely deleted.

If you know the road is inaccessible to vehicles then please tag it as such. Also properly add any barriers as nodes. The length od road is not a barrier.
Need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

119924716 over 3 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Very god first go at mapping to OSM. There's a lot to learn and some points are not easy to see/grasp. Unfortunately your new cycleway Way: 1053151247 is already mapped as a cycleway=opposite direction on the highway=unclassified, Way: Lower Marsh (626245392). So the cycleway and road are mapped as one object/feature.

Thus the new cycleway is a duplication which I've removed.

Regards Bernard.

119917616 over 3 years ago

Amend farm tags, landuse is an area tag.

119917422 over 3 years ago

Hi, I've removed the incorrect name and tagged it as private, if it's a highway there must be some access.

119850500 over 3 years ago

Hi, Sorry but again highway=unclassified added to a residential landuse area Way: 32787047 I've removed the inadvertent tag.

Regards Bernard.

119852448 over 3 years ago

Hi, I've removed the tags bridge=yes and layer=1 from the highway Way: Woodvale (493287582).

119852718 over 3 years ago

Hi, again many warnings of probable mistakes are given above.

119852448 over 3 years ago

Hi, You've added the tag highway=unclassified to a landuse=residential area. I've removed the inadvertent tag. I think that again your mistake was because area outlines are joined onto highway centerlines.

Please look at any warnings like the 10 crossing highways warning mentioned above, these tell you that there are problems. You could then look at correcting any inadvertent mistakes.

Regards Bernard.

119832367 over 3 years ago

Hello There,
Unfortunately, you added the tag highway=service to a large forest area. I've now removed the tag. I think you did this inadvertently because the forest area was joined onto the highway. Joining areas to highway center lines is bad practice because it leads to mistakes like yours. I think I've unjoined the highways from forest areas.

Regards Bernard.

119834477 over 3 years ago

Hi, Please don't add natural=sand to the bunkers. It is not as per OSM guidance. A bunker isn't a natural feature anyway, it's man-made with a surface of sand. A lot of bunker tagging has now twice been corrected.

Regards Bernard.

119844336 over 3 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You somehow placed your company POI about 5 miles from Fowler Road. You also inadvertently got the tagging quite a bit off of OSM practice.

I've moved to POI and corrected the tagging. I took details from your website. Please check the details and placement here:- node/1241441247#map=18/51.60747/0.12270&layers=N Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.