Hi, I unjoined the golf area from the railway line.

OpenStreetMap is not a business directory. If your online shopping store does not have a physical presence then it may not be added to OSM. If it does have a physical presence - for example, if there is an office somewhere - then you can place an office=company object where that office is.

If you add further tags then understand that these tags will describe that physical location, i.e. the office. Do not, for example, add a tag that implies 24/7 opening hours just because the web site is open 24/7 - only add such a tag if the office is open 24/7. Same with any tags that would describe what you are selling; do not add shop=clothes to a place where I cannot buy clothes.

Under no circumstances must you add advertising copy ("World's finest XY", "Premier ABC supplier", "For all your XYZ needs"); this has no place in OSM and will be deleted.

I've tagged the POI as an office for online business.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

OpenStreetMap is not a business directory. If your online shopping store does not have a physical presence then it may not be added to OSM. If it does have a physical presence - for example, if there is an office somewhere - then you can place an office=company object where that office is.

If you add further tags then understand that these tags will describe that physical location, i.e. the office. Do not, for example, add a tag that implies 24/7 opening hours just because the web site is open 24/7 - only add such a tag if the office is open 24/7. Same with any tags that would describe what you are selling; do not add shop=clothes to a place where I cannot buy clothes.

Under no circumstances must you add advertising copy ("World's finest XY", "Premier ABC supplier", "For all your XYZ needs"); this has no place in OSM and will be deleted.

Features added to the OSM database must be verifiable to folk passing by. Thus I've converted the POI to an office.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The officially published Scottish Outdoor Access Code 2005 section 2-11 clearly states where access rights do not apply, link here:- https://tinyurl.com/e4fmxbkd. It's therefore quite clear where and how access rights are applied. This link:- https://tinyurl.com/sek6t37a gives a much simpler guidance to access around various properties.

Thus some of the ways (and/or parts of ways), you've tagged as access=private are certainly accessible under the access code.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, In the absence of a capacity tag on a single parking space it is implied that the capacity is 1. Therefore it's not necessary to tag each single parking space with capacity=1.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I think it's highly unlikely that the house is formally named "A". Has the house has been divided into flats with "A" being one of them, then the flat rather than the house has that name.

UK postcodes are made up of two parts, an outward and an inward part. There should be a space between the two parts of the code.

The address as you've added it is not quite correct so you could still experience problems.

Regards Bernard.

On looking at the whole of the Corbenic Poetry Path route it would be good to add a route relation for it. Especially as the name is unlikely to be the formal name given to all those sections of path. Rather the name Corbenic Poetry Path would be the formal name given to the route. Again if you need help please just ask. Regards Bernard.

Hi, You've placed Way: Corbenic Poetry Path (614777421) on top of the existing Way: 970733275 thus making duplication of highways. I had previously moved the footpath into the woods as I thought that it's position. If the route does go up the service road from the car park then that existing highway ought to be amended. It's not correct mapping to place a highway atop of another.

If you need help with the amendment please just ask. Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your edit only added an untagged way on top of part of an existing highway. Thus it adds nothing to the OSM database, the line bearing no description is ignored. I've reverted the changeset.

I don't know exactly what problem you have but there seems to be nothing wrong with OSM data here. I take it that MRS is a routing app, perhaps there is some deficiency with the app. Could you explain more about the problem? Maybe I can help.

Regards Bernard.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap

The premises should be tagged as disused by Debenhams. If a building is there please amend the tags to present use rather than delete the building. I've reinstated the building.

Ragards Bernard.

OK, I've reverted the changes.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately, your mapping has resulted in many paths being duplicated. Your new paths are placed mainly on top of existing paths and roads. Even the path along the beach is duplicated. Thus because the changes and duplicated ways amend other existing ways I think it's best to revert the whole changeset. I've reverted the changeset in my Changeset: 109131669.

I realise the problems were caused inadvertently. Could you please explain what you were trying to do, maybe I can help.

Regards Bernard

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

No need for a multipolygon relation for a simple object (house). I've amended that and squared up all the buildings. Squaring up is easy in iD editor.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, No harm done, glad to help if you need it.

Regards Bernard.

Please stop uploading until you know what you're doing, you're likely to corrupt the database.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You somehow uploaded 13 nodes onto the exact same position, some tagged as traffic lights, some untagged. I've removed them all for you as I would think the uploads were inadvertent.

Please be careful not to upload fiction or tests to OSM as OSM is a live worldwide database from which maps are constantly being compiled.

Please refrain from uploading again till you know what you're doing. If you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Some were triplicated.

Hi, I removed many untagged nodes.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Some duplicated highway sections were removed.

Regards Bernard.

I've amended a lot but there's still lots more that need fixing.