Field outline removed from highway centerline.

Hi,
A tree row would not likely be directly on top of and joined to a ditch it might be slightly to one side and not joined. It's also unlikely that gates would be directly joined to ditches, a gate might be joined to a bridge on a track or path going over a ditch.

Please try to avoid joining area outlines to the center lines of highways.

Does the path Way: 40592439 go through the gate Node: 9021351750? If so they ought to be joined together so the gate is a barrier to the path.

Regards Bernard.

It's also a good idea and good OSM practice to limit changesets to 10 or 21 objects. Thus it is much easier for you or anyone else to see any mistakes and make corrections. And it would have been easy to reinstate the objects you deleted.
In this changeset you've added 124 objects, imagine trawling through them to pinpoint a mistake.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

It's OSM practice that amendments/corrections when needed are made to any originally mapped objects rather than deleting and redrawing the object. In your deletion of 24 objects you have, (probably inadvertently), removed all of the histories that were associated with those objects. Would you please consider reverting this changeset and correcting rather than deleting objects?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I don't think the shop is really joined to the centerline of the highway? Could you please position it more precisely?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

What was odd about the footpath, it can clearly be seen on Bing imagery? If you know the area perhaps you could improve the footpath mapping rather than merely deleting it. I could reinstate the path so you can improve it, if you wish.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You've now made the footpath (Way: 4715818) zig zag in and out from the school boundary. The school boundary also now crosses into a garden of Crabtree Lane. Surely this isn't right? I did correct the path line yesterday. Do you want me to correct it again or can you correct it?

I've removed more building height tags of 2 metres, (six and a half feet) which don't seem right. Building height is usually taken from the average terrain level to the high point of the roof, as per the link already commented.

Regards Bernard.

Square up buildings.

Square up buildings.

Square up buildings.

Hi, I've reinstated the deleted buildings amending the originals to include your new data.

Several other amendments to other buildings.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Again really no need to delete things. Several amendments made.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
There's no need to delete the buildings, it's OSM's best practice to correct or amend existing mapping if possible. Thus all mapping history is maintained. deleting also deletes history.

There's no need to repeat data on every object and add POIs. For schools, the main overall data is held on the premises outline. I've amended it to suit OSM practice.

Are the buildings 6 feet high and only 1 floor? I think this is inadvertently incorrect, please see previous comments.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please see building:levels=* for advice on building levels tagging. I've removed those tags so you can for the correct levels.

Please see height=* for advice on building height tagging. Are the buildings 13metres (42 feet) high? I've removed those tags so you can for the correct height.

The whole area is tagged residential so tagging the building as building= residential is duplication. Better to tag as building=house. I've amended these tags. I also squared up the buildings, easily done in the iD editor.

There were two number 2 Aldwickbury Crescent, which I've amended.

I amended 82 Aldwickbury Crescent to 82 Crabtree Lane.

I amended seven addresses from Aldwickbury Crescent to Courtfields.

I removed building type tags as residential is implied.

If you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've squared up the building, tweaked the address, and added your website. This to meet OSM practice and better show the enterprise.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Just some tweaks to your mapping, I tagged the building as building=house and removed names as they are likely not formally named as 2, 4, and 6 Sunderland Avenue.

Regards Bernard.

Hello, I just now figured out what the problem is and have removed a flood gate from the highway, (which barred all routing). Then I saw your two notes. Had you responded here I could have fixed it earlier.

When MRA updates the data from OSM the route should work correctly, might be a few days though.

I now have to find out how to correctly map the flood gate.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I did do some tweaking there (mainly for the path and fence if I remember right), but I also noticed the track was strangely aligned. So I joined it up. I take on board your comments/suggestions and have now made three sections of the racecourse one goes over the road. Please see what you think.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed the road that's been closed (doesn't exist anymore). You had inadvertently dragged on top of the existing highway without deleting it. I've also amended to route relation to show these changes.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The name of the disused/closed store was Debenhams hence the tag disused:name=Debenhams. The name was not "disused Debenhams building" so the tag you used, disused:name=disused Debenhams building, is incorrect. I've again corrected the tagging.

Regards Bernard.