I've remove access=no from footpaths.

Hi, I've sectioned off the foot accessible section tagging it access by foot and agricultural.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I think this is a Public Footpath so there would be designated foot access rather than access=no. So I've removed the access=no tag.

You placed part of the path and part of a track on top of each other. So I've removed the duplicate section of the pathway.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreeMap.
Are these features really cooling towers or perhaps storage tanks like others on this site?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've amended the post box collection times to OSM practice. Please use this form in future, Thanks.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've reverted/removed your fiction, you used the wrong tags anyway.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
These POI don't really look like apartments, definitely not the ones placed in the car park area. Were you trying to map the houses? Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, thanks for correcting the terrain. Now the track needs to be correctly aligned, unjoined from the grass area outline and connected to the highway Way: 25333615 at the west end.

Regards Bernard.

It is OSM good practice that when corrections are needed they are done to existing ways. Please do not delete existing ways redrawing them in order to introduce modifications. In doing so you delete all the historical record of the existing way.

In these deletions, you've inadvertently deleted the history of original contributors, the dates, mapping editors used, positions of nodes, the imagery used, tags and placement of nodes. As it is now the history has gone forever.

I had originally thought your fixme tag was on test or temporary lines to assist mapping. Seeing now what has happened I think it would be good to revert these deletions, reinstating the original mapping. The original line (that hold the fixme tags) can be amended and your replacement lines removed. This would reinstate the historical record and be in keeping with OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Could you say how you've determined this as a village with a population of 65 when there seems to be not one dwelling here? Is it a historic village site?

Regards Bernard.

Unjoin tree row from the boundary line. Make gap in hedge and move it off of track.

Hi I've correct nested multipolygon by removing the water tagged line around the islet and placing the islet as an inner in Relation: 7845750,

For more info and examples on nested multiplygons please see:-osm.wiki/Multipolygon_Examples

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've unjoined the footpath from Fuzziecombe Wood.

There are several instances of name=??? with natural=wood on a node. Please be advised that a wood should be drawn as an area, ref:- natural=wood

Way: Green Walk (903760947) looks like it should join the road Way: 25333615 at the west. Green Walk is also joined to the edge of the scrub area Way: 904574012 but look like it really lies down the centre of the area. That area actually looks like a grassed ride rather than scrub.

The above problems noted after looking at only the first twenty ways. There's more than a hundred more that may contain errors.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, with respect if it's not really woodland then it's not woodland. The Bing imagery that you used and I look at indicate a large clear area with vehicles, building and storage areas clearly not in woodland but yet encompassed by your woodland area.
There remains the issue with the woodland drawn joining the centre line of several sections of the highway. It might be easier to delete the wood and redraw it.

Regards Bernard

Hi, to delete an object in the iD editor select/highlight the object, then ctrl+del (this only works if enough of the object invisible in the editor) you may have to section up the object. There's more iD shortcuts here:-osm.wiki/ID/Shortcuts you might wish to see.

It's been frustrating trying to make contact with you over the past month. I've left quite a few comments relating to several anomalies with your contributions. I hope you can take some time to go back and make corrections. Please just ask if you need help. There's also a help forum:-https://help.openstreetmap.org/ and many wiki pages to guide us.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Has the building Way: 903810332 been extended to cover this area?
regards Bernard.

Hi, wood area Way: 907014298 is joined onto the centerline of sevaral highways, it's also drawn over areas that look to be parts of Granger Farmyard. So not all of that area is actually woodland, could you have a look, please?
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Way: 903810331 doesn't look like a building and doesn't even match the ground area on Bing imagery, (the imagery may not be true and you may have ground-truth survey data, if so I apologise). The area looks to me like an area of horticulture with possible polytunnels that can be erected over linear areas as needed. Could you check please.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've unjoined areas and highways from the power line Way: 905508985 as these features don't actually join the power line. I can't see any evidence of a cable on this line, there looks like a pole at Node: 8409104787 and at Coordinates: 51.0037604, -1.461592 but they don't match the line you've drawn. Could you look at this please.

Reference Way: Broadlands Park (900475897). You note that this is not a park, then please don't tag it as leisure=park, estate parkland producing deer is farmland.