Reference Way: 44890614, why can't you delete your fiction or test lines instead of tagging them fixme=delete me? You've done this many times adding lots of rubbish to OSM. Please just delete these lines it's easier and quicker than adding a fixme tag and uploading them.

Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
You have some of the paths here placed over buildings. Clearly incorrect, may I suggest you use Bing background imagery and zoom in close. You'll then be better able to place the path lines correctly.

Also, I doubt the footpath are formally named and they certainly wouldn't all be named Knaves Hill.

If you need help with alterations please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

More duplicated sections of highway.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You inadvertently joined the new path to the field edge outline. Also extended the bridge across the field. No problem though I've made corrections. Please have a look to make sure it's OK now.

regards Bernard.

Yes there are a lot more.

Hi, looks like you've added surface=asphalt to the nodes of some highways. I've removed about 30 of them there may be more. I think the nodes, as well as the ways, were selected when the tag was added. Perhaps you could check.

Regards Bernard.

Again Way: Cranbury Park (108474826) incorrectly tagged as leisure.

Same incorrect tagging, Way: Cranbury Park (305485942) is not leisure=park (it's not a public leisure area). It's landuse=residential, it's named Cranbury Park because it is private parkland, part of the estate. There is a great difference between a park and parkland. Please stop incorrectly changing tags.

Many more problems with your mapping (to many to list individually). If you read this be advised that Way: Cranbury Park (361428234) is a meadow used as farmland but termed as parkland, part of the Cranbury Estate. Tagging as leisure=park indicates the land is used as a leisure area which it certainly is not as far as the public are concerned.

Hi, I've reverted this agricultural land back to a meadow. No evidence for a park unless you can show it.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The park looks like fiction and is drawn self-intersecting so I've removed it. Please only add verifiable features to this live worldwide database, and see the help section first. If I can help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hello Gordon, I didn't realise it was a public footpath. In this case the tags designation=public_footpath and foot=designated show the Public Right of Way status. I've sectioned the ways and added those tags.

Regards Bernard.

A triplicated section of highway repaired, and a duplicated section. This time a wood drawn within a wood (duplication), duplicate wood removed.

Another duplicated highway removed. Why do you keep doing this?

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that some sections of the A1 are now duplicated.
Way: 904401852 is on top of Way: 39007749,
Way: 904401872 is on top of Way: 39007749,
Way: 904321783 is on top of Way: 449251807,
Way: 904401872 is on top of Way: 39007749,
Way: 904401873 is on top of Way: 39007749,
Way: 904401856 is on top of Way: 39007749,
Way: 904401853 is on top of Way: 39007749,
Way: 904401851 is on top of Way: 39007749.

Those are the ones I can see, there are relations involved in nearly all sections so I don't feel I can make corrections.

Regards Bernard.

Retagged Way: 98001921 as part service part track, it's not all footway.

Hi, I've corrected your multipolygon Relation: 12279144

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
59, Paxton Crescent would be part of the address, not the house name. I've drawn the nearest house in and added the address. If that's the correct house all very well, add more info if you can, (city, postcode).

Regards Bernard.

Hi, It now occurs to me that you might have been trying to add a route or trail to the map. It's OK to add such routes to OSM but they need to be the existing sections of path made into a route relation. If this is so I might be able to help out.

Regards Bernard.

Yet more duplicated highway sections removed. Also unjoined one path from an underground cable. Please be more careful.