No response so I've amended the tags. Repositioned POI as best I can.

Your track Way: 899610681 crosses a pond and river with no indication of bridge or ford. It is also joined to landuse areas, the river and river banks and the pond banks. This is incorrect mapping. Can you please correct this or shall I just delete it?

I removed a path from in the river.

You've tagged the river areas incorrectly. The water area should not be tagged natural=water
water=river. The tag waterway=riverbank should be used instead. It's all stated clearly in wiki pages. I've amended these.

I've removed the drain, it doesn't exist.

I've allowed the bridges to properly span right over the water areas.

I've unjoined many highway nodes from waterway nodes.

Please take a little time to learn OSMs best practices as regards tagging.

Thanks.

Hi, Sorry for not mentioning that I'm sure the problem was inadvertently caused. It's the sand area here:- way/259039062#map=19/50.41095/-4.20709 The area each time was changed to make the outline self intersect. This time the area long line of the triangle was transformed into an L shape (the line doubling back on itself). Because there are a residential outline, coast outline, and a mud outline using the same three nodes I'm not able to determine exactly what caused it.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, This is the second time the area of sand Way: 259039062 has been corrupted. I've again repaired it.
Regards Bernard

Hi, Thanks for responding. I couldn't find your map on Facebook but I've heard folk are having problems with it. They then often create more problems because data is uploaded to OpenStreetMap which isn't always to OSM best practice. Not to worry though I've mapped the field as a meadow with hedges around. The tagging of the park feature would be leisure=dog_park but as it's not yet in operation I've tagged it as proposed:leisure=dog_park. The "proposed:" can be removed when the park is in operation and there'll be a nice paw icon. Need any more OSM help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
Is this really a park? Can it be verified? How, where is the entrance? It actually looks like a stock field.

Regards Bernard.

Those two paths do exist, they are drawn on the councils' definitive map. You are allowed to walk them even if they are obstructed. Obstructions should be reported to the County Council who have a statutory duty to have the ways made fit for purpose. They should be shown on OSM and the obstructions also mapped.

Regards Bernard.

Hello, Please understand that if features are visible on the ground (by any means), then they are valid features for mapping to OSM. Even if they are private roads inaccessible to the public. Because a route is closed and fenced off is not a justification to delete it. I've therefore reverted your deletions.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've looked at all the course features you've mapped mainly because several self-intersections and duplicated nodes were reported. Don't worry though I've corrected all those problems.

I've also joined the paths where they overlapped or not quite joined. Regarding the path tagging, golf=path is really not needed and is not rendered. The tag highway=path is rendered. I wonder if you meant these ways to be indicated as cart/buggy paths, if so golf=cartpath, golf_cart=designated, highway=path would be appropriate. If the cart path is on a service way then use highway=service.

Regards Bernard.

Hi. I've amended a few footpaths and removed highways (paths) placed atop of other highways (roads).

Hi, I've removed a few duplicated ways. When a public footpath is on the same line as another highway please amend the existing way to accommodate both statuses.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed your 1000 metre long gate. Could place it as a single node on the track in the same manner as other gates in the area. The gate can be tagged to describe the type of access through it. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

May I suggest looking at this link:- leisure=golf_course It will help you to tag golf course features to OSM best practice. I've made a few tweaks to the features you've already made.

If you need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Apologies entirely my fault but not intentional, my attention was called elsewhere and I forgot to upload.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Deleting a feature also deletes the mapping history of the feature. Thus I've reinstated the original building, ( removing your new one). Then amending the original building line so that all the prior history is maintained.

Regards Bernard.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

This looks like an online business, if there is no physical presence of the company at this location it should not be mapped to OSM. All features on OSM must be verifiable on the ground.

Why not map the location of the business as per your website?

Regards Bernard.

Bridge added to a path that you joined to a stream.

Duplications have started again, I just removed part of the footpath Way: 8121427 which you placed on top of an existing highway. Please stop doing this

Hi I removed the path section that the bridge highway replaces.

Hi, I've removed the section of path placed on top of the bridge because it causes duplication of the footway.