Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

A beach or should be mapped as an area not a node (a single point is referred to as a node inOSM). Please see:- natural=beach As a node only the beach is not recognized as a feature.

Please be careful not to disrupt the other features that the node is part of.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed the multipolygon relation for the 5 houses reverting the addresses. Retagged Way: 119472447 as a track, as it is used by vehicles for agricultural access. I've amended the pharmacy tagging to OSM practice, amenity=pharmacy implies a building and there's no need for two pharmacy tags.

Regards Bernard.

Hello Neil,

Please be advised that OSM is a live worldwide database from which lots of maps are compiled. As such the data you've added will now be downloaded by map makers. Thus the data should if possible conform to current OSM best practice, and not include duplicated data. Please see:- osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

You could map your project using OSM saving it offline without uploading it.

The mapping of plaques is outlined here:- memorial=plaque and gives some good information. There's a site called Open Plaques here:- osm.wiki/Open_Plaques which looks like it links to OSM data.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Can you explain what it is you're trying to do please? Most of the objects/features you added in this and previous changesets are already mapped to OSM. If an object needs correcting or amending it's OSM practice to make changes to the original object.

Regards Bernard.

Fiction removed.

Hi, If the roundabout is open to the public then the construction=secondary tag should be removed.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've reverted these changes as they amended the definitive and legal route of the PRoW. I added your route around the field edge. The public route is as depicted on the County's definitive map and accompanying statement.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your website link isn't valid.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You can easily see what was changed by looking at the three ways below. I added a description to a path, amended another path and a grass area.

The large changeset area was inadvertent.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, This looks like a park area rather than a school. Is it a new school?

Regards.

Removed multipolygon, this is a single regular polygon. Squared up building.

Hi, Thanks for the amemdment, I've squared it up for you. Looks good now.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Way: 945781340 is the inner polygon of a multipolygon. The fact that it is an area is thus implied so area=yes is not needed.

Regards Bernard.

The new building looks out of shape, could you check if the outline is correct please?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, in iD editor you have to click 'ignore this issue' it's OK. The website says the capacity tag is optional therefore not required.

Regards Bernard

Hi, amenity=parking_space is singular, and therefore capacity is implied as singular (1). You've also mapped amenity=parking to which a capacity could be added though it's not necessary, nor incorrect to omit. Indeed for a lot of car parks the individual spaces are not marked out, therefore capacity depends on how the vehicles are parked or their size.

Out of interest what or where tells you there are issues?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've amended the address and website tags to OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You actually drew the larger house twice, one atop the other. I've removed the duplicate, divided the house into two houses then squared the three up.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've amended the names to designation tags as per OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

Hello Chris, Thanks for responding, that's easy then I've just removed the designation=permissive_bridleway tag.

Regards Bernard.