BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 105416229 | over 4 years ago | Hi this has made a triplicated highway. Way: Route de Bayeux-Tilly (947701217) and Way: Route de Bayeux-Tilly (947702752) are on top of the existing Way: 220893182. Could you please remove the offending ways they disrupt routing? Regards Bernard. |
| 105288861 | over 4 years ago | Hi, you are making a lot of duplicated highways. |
| 105288442 | over 4 years ago | Hi, you've made a duplicated highway here. Regards Bernard. |
| 102729115 | over 4 years ago | Hi, You've placed highway Way: Ciclovia Empresarial (929145004) on to of an existing highway making a duplicate way. The same problem with Way: Acesso estação Paço de Arcos (929145003), Regards Bernard. |
| 105761272 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. OSM is a live worldwide database with which to compile ground-truth maps. As such everything added to OSM must be accurate and verifiable. You describe this as an online facility thus I take it as nothing verifiable on the ground. If it is an office it would not be the whole building, and a POI would be appropriate. Further, you've removed the residential tag. Thus I've reverted this changeset.
Regards Bernard. |
| 105316934 | over 4 years ago | Duplicate store removed. |
| 105319143 | over 4 years ago | Hi, You have lots of warnings about buildings crossing over each other here. Could you please resolve the problems? Regards Bernard. |
| 105633178 | over 4 years ago | Fiction removed Way: 949120743 and several other duplicated highways. Regards Bernard. |
| 100908532 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The school is already mapped (Way: 353161178) as a multipolygon. I've added the name to the relation. Regards Bernard. |
| 105717868 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Single trees are shown as a single node on OSM. So I've made an amendment to your climbing tree to suit OSM practice. Regards Bernard. |
| 105679305 | over 4 years ago | Hi, some field edges seem to be drawn around the shadows of trees. Regards Bernard, |
| 105662292 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Are you sure you have the right position and address because this house is nearer to Raleigh way than Pendleton? If it is correct then correct tags would be:-
The tags addr:housename=Sunny City and name=42 Pendleton are incorrect and should be removed. Regards Bernard. |
| 105535448 | over 4 years ago | Hi, you made an admin boundary into a highway also removing the admin tag. This could cause serious malfunction to routers. I've removed the mistakes. Regards Bernard. |
| 105537203 | over 4 years ago | Hello, I can find no reference to these changes (new roundabout and toll gantry). Even if genuine the mapping seems poor, you have 3 warnings above. Could you please state a reference for the changes? If this is fiction please remove the changes ASAP. Regards Bernard |
| 105460409 | over 4 years ago | Way: Hill view Avenue (948019955), duplicated highway removed |
| 102886493 | over 4 years ago | No response so I've removed the tag |
| 105371613 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I'm sorry to say that the new Way: 947390907 which you added has no tags to show what it is. I think you meant it as a path but it is placed atop an existing highway (Way: 4252430) thus making a duplication of a highway. When a feature needs amending or correcting OSM practice is to do this to the existing way. I realise your mistake is inadvertent and have left it for now so you can see what I mean. You did add the path to the route relation. Because so many features here are all joined together I think it's best to revert your changeset. If you need any help please just ask. Regards Bernard. |
| 105290479 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. May I suggest you look at the Maxar Imagery in the iD editor. It's the latest imagery in which you'll see your houses are a bit out. To select an imagery layer click the background settings icon on the right side of the screen, then click select Maxar. Regards Bernard. |
| 105190714 | over 4 years ago | Hi, you made a lot of duplicate nodes around here, I think I've removed all the duplicates. You can see above the changeset resulted in 15 warnings:close_nodes:vertices Regards Bernard. |
| 105251616 | over 4 years ago | Some good amendments, but the area is already tagged as park and green so landuse=village_green is not appropriate. Only a formal name should go in the name= tag. I've amended to suit. Regards Bernard. |