Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

A POI on the side of a road with only name and description tags is not really helpful. Please remember that features in the OSM database must be verifiable. So is your company physically based near here? Could the premises be drawn and a complete address be added, maybe include a website?

If you need help please just ask. Regards Bernard.

Hi, It's OSM good practice that when a feature needs correcting/amending that the correction is made to the existing feature, (not delete and redraw). Thus all the history of the object is retained and maintained.

I've reverted the change and tweaked the pond outline. You can now see the history from the original mapping in 2014.

Regards Bernard.

PS Could you please correct the problems reported in your previous changeset:- changeset/104825515

No response so I've amended the lines to buildings.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You seem to have the bridleway Way: 944366715 designated as permissive but all access as private. Logically if the designation is permissive then the access must be permissive. The way can be tagged access=private with foot, horse, cycle as permissive as the case may be.

Regards Bernard.

Hi I've changed some name tags to description tags as they are descriptions not formal names.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I see you've got several warnings on this changeset, several for highway crossing a highway without a join. Could you please look to rectifying these problems?

I've fixed a house that you inadvertently dragged out of shape.

Regards Bernard.

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The features you've mapped look very much like buildings with yes brick walls. But in OSM they would be tagged as a building, the fact that they have walls is implied, (but you could tag the walls as a description of the building. This applies to all the walls you've mapped around here.

Of course, I may be wrong, have the buildings all been removed leaving walls only? Could you please have a look and make any corrections. If you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You've got several footpaths crossing streams with no bridge or ford.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, are you talking about the coastal path or the other tracks.

All land is in ownership and therefore all land could be said to be private.

The coastal path is all legally defined as a public footpath. But it is on private land. By law, it is the surface of the (private) land over which the highway passes which is vested to the Highway Authority.

The status of the other tracks may well be such that you are not allowed access but that does not exclude them from being mapped. They are highways and must have some form of access be it private, agricultural or permissive in some form.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've restored the removed highway for reasons given in another comment.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've restored the tracks that you removed. Any feature that is verifiable is OK on OSM. The tracks are clearly visible on aerial imagery so are valid features for inclusion in the OSM database. That they may be on private property is not a reason for deletion. The tracks are even shown on several Ordnance Survey maps.

Names in OSM must be formal and verifiable. The Barling Coastal Walk is made up of several footpath which form a route, I doubt they're all formally named Barling Coastal Path though the whole route maybe so named. A named route can be added to OSM in a route relation. I've removed the names.

If you need help adding a route or anything else please just ask. Regards Bernard.

Amended to remove duplicated highway.

Hi Robert, "The yellow house" (place). I take it you mean is a feature/object tagged with place=???
This feature which you refer to does not exist in OSM. Instagram is trying to help your search

If you search Instagram for "The yellow house" you can get the big white blob. You have to be a bit more precise with your search, add restaurant, jazz, lower road london then your search will bring up the features you want.

After a short play with Instagram I'm of the opinion it's not worth the hassle. Much better to search with OpenStreetMap.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I tweaked the building tags to OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've installed an android emulator on my PC and managed to get Instagram on that. I searched for The Yellow House, Lower Road, London. Instagram loads a page titled "The yellow house Jazz Nights" there's a map with a red pointer in the right place near Surrey Quays. I'm not able to zoom in on that map though. The "little i" is for reporting a problem but I can see no problem to report.

What is the problem that you want to fix or report?

I don't think I can help anymore. The data in OSM is definitely to OSM practice though.

Regards Bernard.

I don't use Instagram so can't comment on that. The data in OSM is correct so the problem must be with Instagram. Do you know how often Instagram updates its map data? The problem might be resolved when the data is updated.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, That company and address are not here so I've reverted the changes. Please don't use OSM for advertising but feel free to add genuine verifiable features.

Regards Bernard.

Fiction removed.

Hi, all tagged information is now on the building outline including opening hours. I've removed the disused:amenity=pub and the note that the place is boarded up. The place should now appear properly on maps and Instagram.

Regards Bernard.

No response so I've made corrections.