Hi, Are you sure these are tracks? They look like field edges to me, maybe there are paths on the field edges. Tracks are where vehicles can go.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Glad to assist, need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The correct tagging for this closed business would be disused:amenity=restaurant
disused:name=Chop Shop. This way folk can see exactly what's not now used. I've added these tags. If you know the shop is to be relet then you could add shop=vacant.

There exists a POI for a playground to the south of the park area. Are there actually two playgrounds? or should one be removed?

Regards Bernard.

I've removed a lot of your fictional areas.

Hi, Lots of problems with the hedges and field outlines around this area. Also existing features pulled out of shape by your mapping. I've corrected a lot round this area.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The road shows on the Maxar imagery so I've tweaked the line a bit to suit.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpendStreetMap.

Do you have more information/data on these two features/objects? The name only isn't much help to anyone, descriptions and notes aren't rendered.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, you joined the footpath to a building, I've corrected it for you. Please be careful with your editing, it's best to check before uploading.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You drew a building over an existing building making a duplication. If a feature needs correcting or amending it's OSM best practice to do the correction to the existing feature. I've removed your duplication and placed your new tags on the existing building.

Please take time out to learn how to map in OSM. Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You've inadvertently duplicated some sections of highways by placing The Leitrim Way ontop of existing highways. Please see here:-https://tinyurl.com/en5uxz6b If a way needs correcting or amending this should be done to the existing way. Not placing a new way on top of the existing way.

A better way to create a national waymarked trail is by creating a route relation. Then the existing ways can be cut into sections, amended to account for the new info (walking route), and added to the relation. There's a lot to learn before making a router relation, an introduction is here:-https://learnosm.org/en/josm/josm-relations/

Could you please remedy these duplicated highways? If you need help (I'm willing), please just ask in the comments here.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, It looks to me like the lanes are marked, there's a white line between the cycleway lane and the single oneway carriage lane.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The area doesn't extend to the centerline of the highway. Mapping this way is incorrect (not ground-truth) and makes it very difficult to amend features in years to come.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've moved the area from the highway center lines.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've squared up the buildings, they look good now.

In iD editor to do this press shift+Ctrl click on (highlight/select) all items to be squared up, then right-click and click the square icon.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I don't think Vespucci gives reasons or alternative tags when it says something is deprecated. So the problem here is inadvertent.

If a particular tag is deprecated that is not reasonable cause to delete it. It can be left to assist other mappers or amended if there is a better tag. The tag direction=up does impart knowledge to other users so for that reason ought not to be deleted.

In this case, the tag key direction was also used for purposes other than steps. It was deprecated to tag key incline. So for steps, the tag direction=up should have been amended to incline=up.

Deleting the tag removed information from the database. Leaving or amending the tag would not have lost information.

Thus I've added incline=up to the two sets of steps. Please see :- highway=steps .

Regards Bernard

Hi, Thanks for understanding. The deleted items are reinstated and the grass repaired to its former state in Changeset: 100226740

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I deleted the pedestrian crossing from the underground line.

The cafe is not the whole building so should not be tagged to the whole building outline. I've reverted the building tags and added a POI for the cafe. Placed your tags on the cafe POI and also added the website.

Looks good now, hope that's all OK.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Thanks for your response. With respect may I point out that the highway areas are features that can be mapped to OSM, please see here:- area:highway=*. The only problem is that they should be tagged as area:highway=* as opposed to area=yes and highway=*

It's not a very widely mapped feature but there are over 171,000 uses. It's not always rendered on OSM maps but it can be done, OsmAnd renders it. It is usually seen on detailed OS maps and is used by planners and councils.

These areas have been in the OSM database since 2014 and I think they should be reinstated. Even if to some folk they seem to serve no obvious purpose. They are genuine verifiable features the same as railway landuse is mapped.

I can reinstate them with no alteration to other features you've added. This will also correct the grass area.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Yes they're all connected properly now. Well done. If you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard

Hi, I did tag the section of highway into The Croft grounds as highway=service and service=driveway as you yourself seemed to point this out.

I've now tagged the north section as highway=service. For the record, the field originally had a footpath going across it so there may well be a right of public access.

It would still be wise to map the gates, I can help if you wish.

Regards Bernard.