Hello Joseph,
Sorry I don't use Go Map, I use JOSM which is by far the best most versatile editor for OSM mapping. There is a Go Map guide here:- https://learnosm.org/en/mobile-mapping/gomap/ but it's very basic.

You did manage to join up one path junction. I'll have a look at your edits later on and see if I can fix the anomalies.

Regards Bernard.

Hello, I've again reinstated the highway that you've twice deleted. I've sectioned the way splitting it at the residential boundary area. I've tagged the residential section as highway=service and service=driveway. I again separated the two areas abutting the track, this can clearly be seen on imagery and is shown as such on the county council map. This track as well as being verifiable by the public is also shown on Ordnance Survey maps and on the official Essex Highways map. Please do not cause vandalism to this map by deleting the track.

If there are gates on the track they can be added and tagged as to the traffic access. I am personally reluctant to tag things as private because as I said, virtually everything in the UK is private. Being private does not mean that no access exists. You could tag the track section as private if you wish. I wouldn't object to that.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The fact that the track is private is not a valid reason to delete it from OSM. Almost all land in the UK is owned and therefore private, even land where there is a right of public access is private. I've thus reinstated the track as it can clearly be seen on imagery and its existence is verifiable.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've noticed that a lot of the paths and cycleways you've added are not joined together to make and extend the highway network. Some double-back on themselves (self-intersecting). Some are joined but cross over other ways.
Thus they are of limited use to the OSM database. May I suggest you go over your recent changes and remedy the problems? If you need help please just ask by commenting here.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Just wanted to let you know that this changeset removed 15 ways covering a large area. It deleted highway areas and some grass areas.

I wonder was this intentional, if so then why? Was it inadvertent, if so the deletions might be reversible? Would you like help reverting the deletions?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You've unjoined the field edge and one of the hedges from the railway. This still leaves the other hedge joined and the stream culvert (layer-1) joined to a field edge, a railway, an admin boundary, a wood edge, and a service road. Could you please have another go at fixing these issues? Thanks.

Hi, I just looked at a few of the sidewalks and I see you have duplicated quite a few of them. In some cases like on West Main Street where the sidewalk is a tag on the street way, the sidewalk is triplicated.

When the sidewalk is marked as a tag (sidewalk=both,left or right) on the carriageway then a separate sidewalk should not be drawn. Sidewalks are usually drawn when there is a separation between the carriageway and footway, where there is a narrow grass verge or parking bays. Please see:-sidewalk=*

It would be good if you could rectify the anomalies.

Regards Bernard

OK, you also have the hedges Way: 895831827 and Way: 895831833 and a field edge Way: 895831834 connected to the railway.
Could you fix these problems as well, please?
Perhaps if you slowed down a bit you wouldn't make so many mistakes. You'd also have time to go back and rectify your very numerous past mistakes.

Regards Bernard.

You've got the stream Way: 906270129 going up an embankment to connect to a railway. Down the other side of the embankment then connecting to a service road. The stream also connects to several area outlines. Could you fix the problems please?
Thanks.

Hi, another duplication of highways. Track Way: 910971576 placed exactly on top of Way: 910971571. Could you please correct this? If you need help just ask.
Thanks.

Hi, I waited while you made amendments.
Looking at it just now the only thing I added was horse=yes to the gate in the middle, because horse access is allowed up to the gate on each side. All is OK.

Regards Bernard

They are live in the OSM database for download immediatly. The software or data renderer you use will determine when you'll see the changes OSM map is almost immediate for highways. Other software could be hours days or weeks. Remember also that not all zoom levels are re-rendered at the same time. Empty your browser cache if you don't see the change on the OSM map.

Regards Bernard.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

It certainly looks like you are correct in part. The track does not extend at the west end to meet public footpath 050. But looks like existing from Little Tring Road to the farm. The western end is part of public footpath 051.
Another problem with your deletion is that you've misaligned other mapped features.

I've reverted this changeset and made amendments to what I can see is correct from available sources. I tagged the track as access=agricultural. You could tag the farm use only section as access=private, though frankly, all land is private.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You've inadvertently duplicated the name. The name and all details of the school are tagged on the school's overall premises outline. This is as per OSM practice as explained here:-building=school and in more detail here:-amenity=school

I've removed the duplication for you, need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, you duplicated a section of Wrenbury Heath Road. I've removed it.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed the motorway junctions. Please don't upload corrupting fiction to meet your personal desires. If there is a barrier here or some traffic restriction please map it correctly. If you need help please just ask in the comments here.

Regards Bernard.

Unfortunately, you have the bridge, (layer=1) which is part of the highway joined onto the riverbank (layer=0 implied), this is incorrect. The bridged highway should span (go completely over) the water to join solid ground. You have also tagged the water area as natural=water
water=river this is incorrect the river area should be tagged waterway=riverbank. You've also joined the track onto land area outlines, wood, meadow and forest which is not good practice

There are many more problems with your past mapping that I've commented on in the changesets. Please see here:- @conifermapper/history#map=12/51.1435/-1.6397&layers=N load all changesets to see about 40 comments.

Thus it might be best and easiest to just remove problems like this.

No response so POI removed as I see nothing to verify it.

No response so I've amended all the buildings tags.

OK nothing corrected so I've made corrections.