Hi, You're still making lots of duplicate highways around here. Please be a bit more careful and stop placing highway atop highway. Why? Because it seriously disrupts routing.

Regards Bernard.

Removed self intersections, crossing highways, rectified highway crossing water.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

This building is not the registered office for THE STUDENT HOUSING COMPANY (LONDON) LIMITED which is situated in Bristol. Could you please remove the incorrect POI? It would be OK to map it at the correct location.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
I changed the path name= to ref= because it's actually the council reference numbering. I removed the tag name=permissive diversion as this is obviously not a name, nor, I think, is it an official permissive diversion route. It might better be described in a note as an alternative route if a walker finds the definitive route in any way obstructed. But then you are permitted to choose your own route to overcome any obstruction.

Regards Bernard.

No response so I added access=private and an explanation note.

No response so I've corrected your mistakes by re-positioning the silo as best I can. Then adding the slurry tank.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please take a little time to learn about OSM best practice for contributing. You'll find it's a wonderful database to which you can add almost any information provided its added in the correct way.

Unfortunately in trying to promote your company you've added false information which negatively impacted the database. Thus I've reverted your changes.

I would normally try to help by getting info from the web but in this case, when trying to access your website I'm told "Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead". So I can't help.

Regards Bernard.

I've just removed a duplicate bridge you placed atop of the original bridge.

Hi, Please be careful and check warnings before uploading, I've just removed several sections of duplicate track you added.

Regards Bernard.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

There's a small problem, OSM expects natural=wetland and water=pond to be areas rather than a node. Note wetland=pond would not be used for a pond. Please see natural=water OSM would not expect to see inland water described as tidal, intermittent maybe.

I can only see one small pond on aerial imagery, (which I've added), are these ponds recently created? Could you perhaps approximately draw them? Otherwise, although the POI causes no problem (except being flagged as incorrect) it serves no function except to display the name.

Need help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The status of this road and track is actually of byway open to all traffic, so there's designated access. I've amended the ways to suit this status.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, on a particular line there can only be one highway. Placing a second path atop an existing one is duplication even though there may be two routes on that one path. Thus I've removed several sections of the duplicated path.

A much better way to depict the routes is with a route relation. Section up the paths, create a route relation, tag it with the route details name etc then add all sections of that route to the relation. A single section can be used in several route relations and the individual section of the path should not be named. This way folk can see the whole route as one depiction.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed Way: Hulland Ward FP 1 (898045087) as it duplicates original Way: 226454732 which is tagged a public footpath.

Regards Bernard.

No response so I've corrected the obvious faults of duplication and squared things up. Tagged the paths and area private.

Hi,

I was wondering why you deleted these 32 grass areas? Have they all been removed?

Regards Bernard.

Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I notice that to amend/correct the database you've been deleting and redrawing features. May I point out that in making amendments and or corrections in this manner has removed the not only the original feature but also the associated history. It is OSM practice that when a feature needs amendment/correction that amendment/correction is done to the original feater with no deletion. Thus all history associated with the object plus the new history is maintained fully.

Regards Bernard.

Hi Steve,

The bridleway is correctly drawn and tagged to describe a Public Right of Way. Therefore theres is nothing to correct, though there maybe other tags that could be added such as the PRoW reference number.

The red and green dotted lines are a depition that Ordnance Survey use to represent PRoW on their Explorer and Landranger maps. OS is nothing to do with OSM.

It is not directly identified on the OSM frontpage map because that map is not rendered in order to highlight the presence of PRoW's. Please understand that OSM is not a map, it is a database from which data is manipulated to give (via a stylesheet) a desired depiction. On the right side of the OSM frontpage click the Layers icon, there you can choose from 6 differently rendered map styles.

This link https://tinyurl.com/y42n8tke will go to a map style designed to show various trails and PRoW in a style to make them more prominent. Again this map can show different styles/layers, click control, the layer menu can be accessed by hovering over the hamburger icon at top right.

You are free to download OSM data and compile your own style of map. Some maps allow you to download the stylesheet with the data so the stylesheet can be manipulated. I have gone through this process once but for a novice, it's a bit daunting.

I hope that starts to explain things and I'll help further if I can, just ask.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, the name is already tagged in the route Relation: Test Way (9061) so no need to add the name again to the path. It's the route that's named not the path. So I've removed the path name.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, several sections of path you added to the Test Way were placed on top of existing highways, these are already tagged as foot=designated. So I've removed the duplicates.

Regards Bernard.

Made a multipolygon to show the islet is a cutout of the pond and to allow correct rendering.