OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
97856330 almost 5 years ago

Hi, Is this rec' open to the public or private school grounds?

97854687 almost 5 years ago

Hi, I have moved the residential area off of the highway centerline.

97856713 almost 5 years ago

Hi, the feature you tagged as man_made=silo is actually a slurry containment/settlement tank. There looks to be a silo nearer the road in the buildings.

Regards Bernard.

97837187 almost 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I just wanted to let you know that some sections of paths in the maze have been duplicated by your method of drawing. Doubling back on a line to extend a path in a different direction is self-intersecting on itself thereby causing two lines to be drawn on the same path. Instead of doubling back please draw several lines, this is OSM practice.

If you need help rectifying this area please just ask in the comment box here.

Regards Bernard

97525005 almost 5 years ago

motorway removed

97761453 almost 5 years ago

Hi Mex,

I'm obviously not sure of what you were doing but I can say what caused the duplication, just for your future reference.

You seem to have made many edits to Way: Stanhope (4763207), the residential landuse polygon for Stanhope. In the last changeset: 97603697 you inadvertently added Highway=residentail to it. Thus adding a very long circular highway. I just removed that extra highway tag.

Regards Bernard.

97511876 almost 5 years ago

Hi,
As far as I can see most of the tracks you removed were around the edges of agricultural areas. Some were even tracks separated from agricultural areas by hedges. As I said almost all are visible on aerial imagery, on Ordnance Survey maps and on the Norfolk County Council website map. In fact, the County Council map shows more tracks than are mapped to OpenStreetMap.

One track is tagged as access=destination, the others are all tagged access=agricultural or access=private. So you can see that contributors to OSM have been careful to avoid inferring any inappropriate access.

Regards Bernard.

97689823 almost 5 years ago

Hi, apologies I assumed the name was correct, it seems the name is not decided, (or at least I can't find a name).

I think it's far better to accommodate an estate on a single polygon if that's possible and indeed it is here. There were previously about 30 areas making up one estate. Why would you want to break it up into small pieces of the same area? The nearby residential areas are not split into small areas as you propose. A single node for the neighbourhood would define an area of no measurement.

I suppose I would mind if you changed it back to small areas for the reasons above. But I'll not object, argue or seek a reason, it'll be OK with me. There could well be something I'm not able to see.

Regards Bernard.

97696934 almost 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I moved the building outlines off of the shadows then squared them up. You can easily square up buildings they look much neater.

Regards Bernard.

97512518 almost 5 years ago

Hi, There's been no response so I've reverted all changesets that deleted genuine features, this in my Changeset: 97679344

Regards Bernard.

97512464 almost 5 years ago

Hi, There's been no response so I've reverted all changesets that deleted genuine features, this in my Changeset: 97679344

Regards Bernard.

97511876 almost 5 years ago

Hi, There's been no response so I've reverted all changesets that deleted genuine features, this in my Changeset: 97679344

Regards Bernard.

97496672 about 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You placed your new unnamed road Way: 895210964 on top of the existing roadway Glebe Crescent, thus duplicating a highway. I've removed your duplicating way. It's OSM practice to make amendments/corrections to the existing way thereby keeping all history intact. So if Glebe Crescent needs correcting pleas do this to the existing way. Further in the absence of highway restrictions, it is implied that there are normal rights of access thus bicycle=yes
foot=yes
motor_vehicle=yes are implied on a highway=living_street.

Is this section of Glebe Crescent really 20mph as you've not indicated the other sections as such, seems isolated.

I've tweaked the houses a bit as well.

Regards Bernard
Need help please just ask.

97571898 about 5 years ago

Hi, Thanks for your informative reply. It would be really good to have the car parks checked and amended.

Regards Bernard.

97571898 about 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I looked at your addition of motor_vehicle=no to most of Fairmead Road and wonder how the two car parks near the middle of that road are accessed. Are they also closed to vehicles?

Regards Bernard.

97553757 about 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I tweaked your new tags to suit OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

97512518 about 5 years ago

Hi, Could you please respond ASAP about the questions regarding this and previous deletion of data from OSM.

You'll find it difficult to revert these deletions, I can revert them for you if you wish. It would be good if you could give your reason for the changes though.

Regards Bernard.

97177736 about 5 years ago

No response so I've removed the construction tags for you.

97310201 about 5 years ago

Hi,

Footpath Way: 893004174 is separated from the carriageway by a grass verge so it's not a sidewalk. I've removed that tag and also removed grass areas from the centres of highways.

Regards Bernard.

97515784 about 5 years ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
It seems that someone made a duplicate outline of the hospital. I've removed the newer outline leaving the 2010 outline. I then tweaked the drawing, adding your new data (many thanks) to the original building, also added the website.

Regards Bernard.