Hi, Thanks for your quick response to my query.
For your bicycle question the tag is oneway:bicycle=no I don't think that's supported on the editor you're using so I've added it. Hope that's OK.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Just checking, are you sure you've got the oneway direction correct, has it been changed in the last year or two? Reason being is the Bing imagery shows vehicles going/facing the other way.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, There were more footpaths around here, do you have more information, did you just walk to that point and back again? Was your walk from Norwich Road, A1062? If so is the path on the farm track from the road or fenced in around the field edge?
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You connected the south-east end of the path to an administrative boundary line, placing a highway crossing point there.
The boundary isn't a physical feature so the path ought not join onto it, the path as drawn does not cross another highway here so the can't be a highway crossing point.
I've made a correction un-joining the path from the boundary line and removing the crossing.

Regards Bernard.

OK, thanks for your response. I've made the corrections but it really is simplicity to map correctly in the first place.
Regards Bernard.

Hi,
More duplications of major highway sections.
Way: 823423950, Way: 823423947 and Way: 823423942 placed on top of existing highway.

I've removed the duplicates.

Hi,
You made a duplication of a major highway, this could disrupt routing.
Way: SH79 (824738712) was placed on top of Way: SH79 (824035370)

I have deleted the duplication but please be careful not to make these duplications. You were warned of the problem, (see above "warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway")

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Your POI is located over the town council building. I think it should be over the building where Andy's Angling Centre is, that's number 19.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You have the building drawn over a wall.

Hi,
Your wood areas overlap each other. They could well join each other but I doubt they overlap. There are also highways joined to the wood edge, are the paths in or out of the woods?
Regards Bernard.

Hi,
You've joined the track to a wall, showing the wall extending to the center line of the track. Is it really joined, if so how do vehicles overcome the wall end?

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
You've mapped the track as passing through the wall, this surely can't be correct. Is there a gap in the wall, if so could you please correct it?

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
You are duplicating a lot of nodes, please see here :-http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-1.94228&lat=53.74626&zoom=14&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Could you please remedy these anomalies? Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed a few ways you inadvertently duplicated, maintaining the new tags.
Is there a bridge where Way: 823582292 crosses the stream?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I did change some of the tags. I've just now changed the rest.
Regards Bernard.

Hi,
I joined Way: 816435294 to the service road that it crosses over. Amended bicycle tags.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Foot and horse are the designated access on a public bridleway. Cycling is usually allowed by the highway authority but it's not designated as such, so the tag is bicycle=yes. I've corrected the tag.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've made quite a lot of amendments here. You changed a power line to a path. made several path line that didn't quite look right. Rather than try to explain them it was easier for me to make corrections as best I could. Please have a look and see if I've done anything wrong.
I couldn't determine how the paths cross under the M5, perhaps you can look at that.

Regards Bernard.

Hi Alan, My apologies I hadn't realised that you'd made corrections.
Regards Bernard.

Hello Alan,
Please understand that OSM is a live worldwide database. Data is constantly being used to compile thousands of maps. So folk could at this very minute be downloading your temporary data. If there's someone specifically downloading golfing data his map is going to be corrupt.
Although in this case the corrupt data is of minor importance this should not happen. Might I suggest you use JOSM to compile temporary data that can then be stored offline, not uploaded. Or even that you use a sandbox utility.

You say the data is not for OSM, then it ought be reverted ASAP.

Regards Bernard.