Hello Peter,
It seems that you've made quite a lot of duplicated sections of highway, please see here :- https://tinyurl.com/y36qr2tj
Could you please rectify these problems?

You've also mapped a lot of highway=crossing points that I don't think exist, unverifiable, look to have no indication on the ground. If these crossing points are official then they could be tagged crossing=unmarked. To map unofficial crossing could be misleading.
There's also a lot of grass areas that extend over or to the centrelines of highways. It's not usual for grass areas to extend to highway center lines.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Please don't corrupt the database by removing the highway status/type tag, by all means correct it if it's wrong.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
It may well be a private road but there is public access on foot. So please don't make incorrect statements. I added foot=yes to the southern gate.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Most of the data was on the building polygon so I've consolidated all the data on building, no need for a POI with duplicate data.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Features added to OSM must be correct and verifiable. The name Home is very unlikely thus the tourist apartment is very unlikely. So I've removed the tags, if you can show their verifiability the tags can be replaced.

Regards Bernard.

Very good Robert, Thanks.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I see you removed the garage name. Is fuel still sold from the premises? If not then the amenity=fuel POI should be removed.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I removed the fictional name.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
The grass does not extend over the highway. So I've reverted this change.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, The church graveyard is one area and includes the church as well. The same applies to the cemetery, the whole area is the cemetery including paths, car park and chapel.
You have deleted these main features and the line of the public footpath.
Could you please rectify these problems.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've disconnected your joining the path to an area outline.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, the recreation area Millennium Woodland is already mapped as a multipolygon with the recreation feature tagged on the outer area. So I've removed the duplicated area Millennium Woodland (827637963, v2)

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You are overlapping areas of landuse with the same value (landuse=residential overlapping landuse=residential).
Also placing leisure=park on top of landuse=residential the area is either a park or residential.
Also joining landuse to the centreline of highways, usually landuse does not extend to the centre of highways.

Could you please look to remedy these problems.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Your changes resulted in the deletion of a landuse area are the misalignment of a road and bridge. I could not see that you actually added anything so I've reverted your changes to the original map state.
If you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've redrawn your building to better match Bing imagery, terraced it into four houses which looks right. Then placed your house into the block with your tags.

I removed the name which I think is your personal description rather than the house formal name, (not a good thing anyway to put personal info into OSM). I also removed the height=30 tag. OSM uses meters to tag heights, I doubt the house is 30 meters high. You can always correct/add info if my assumptions are wrong.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I removed the access=no tag because access is allowed on the footpath as per your foot and bicycle tags.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, If the church is used it be tagged with amenity=place_of_worship
religion=christian

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
I've removed the self intersection from your water area polygon Way: 825715094. Tagged the islet and created a multipolygon of the water and islet.
I noticed you've made similar self intersections in the past, perhaps you could in the future use this method to show similar features.

Regards Bernard.

Hi Andy,
The reference to a public footpath was in the tag name=Public Footpath on the way that I removed and the tag name=PF on a node which was also removed.
The path I determined to be a public footpath was determined by looking at OS explorer map. So without first hand knowledge I did not add that info. That path is Lancastrians mapping and tagging being the extension at north of Dacre's Bridge Lane. I did remove the tag name=To Dcares Bridge Lane believing it to be not the formal name.

If Lancastrian knows the status of the footpath to be public he could add designation=public_footpath.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
You somehow inadvertently dragged a few highways out of position and duplicated sections of the footpath you added. I've repositioned the highways and amended the paths as best I can.
Please don't add fiction names (Public Footpath is not a name). There's only one short public footpath I can determine here extending Dacre's Bridge Lane.

Regards Bernard.