OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
156444411 over 1 year ago

Hi, You have 90 warnings about highway problems here as stated above. Also you later drew a building directly on top of some of the footpaths.

Can you please correct these problems?

Regards Bernard.

156421398 over 1 year ago

Node removed, the islet is already mapped, and I've added your new tags to the existing islet.

156421788 over 1 year ago

Reverted, the hotel and the several bars/restaurants are already mapped.

156422239 over 1 year ago

Reverted duplication.

156422367 over 1 year ago

The boundary already exists and the relevant relations hold the descriptive tags. I've reverted/removed.

156422676 over 1 year ago

Deleted highway reinstated.

156423334 over 1 year ago

Requested Review, There are many problems mostly your addition of fiction. I'll revert the changeset.

Please don't add fiction or corrupt the database.

Regards Bernard.

156406084 over 1 year ago

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I know you have good intentions for adding Sheffield Road Cycleway but unfortunately, there are many problems. There are 18 warnings of crossing highways as stated above. This is because a large part of the new highway (SRC) is placed on top of the existing cycleway. Also in places the cycleway presence is tagged of the main highway, (cycleway:both=track). You've drawn the cycleway crossing several roads without a joining to them. Also the cycleway has been joined to underground cables.

For these reasons I think it's best to revert this changeset. I can do the revert for you if you wish?

Regards Bernard.

156405890 over 1 year ago

The changeset was reverted as FP 5 was already mapped.

156405428 over 1 year ago

Hi, I've reverted this changeset as FP 16 is already mapped.

Regards Bernard.

156405286 over 1 year ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've reverted this changeset because the highway you added was already mapped. Thus, the new highway was a duplication that could disrupt routing.

Could you explain what you were trying to do, perhaps I could help.

Regards Bernard.

156333749 over 1 year ago

review_requested, If you zoom in you can more precisely map buildings. You can also square them up in the iD editor. They will then look much neater and more like the imagery provided. Don't join buildings unless you know they are joined.

Regards Bernard.

156333882 over 1 year ago

Hi, Can you please fix the many instances of crossing highways as warned about above?

156332672 over 1 year ago

Hi, Please heed the warnings given on upload and stated above. I've removed the stream Way: 1314070245 as it duplicated an existing stream which actually has more detail tags.

156332658 over 1 year ago

Please heed any and all warnings before given before uploading and as stated above. I've removed these two fictional motorways mainly because they duplicate an existing highway.

156294858 over 1 year ago

Hi, there are problems with self-intersecting ways here starting with Way: 1313870887

156195644 over 1 year ago

Hi, I've removed two highways that you placed on top of existing highways, Way: 1313007960 and Way: 1313007939. This duplication disrupts routing.

Regards Bernard

156189490 over 1 year ago

Hi, Please be advised that you've placed most of Way: 1313259461 on top of existing highways. This is highway duplication that could disrupt routing. Could you please remove your duplication.

Secondly, is the junction Queens Gardens to Storkport Road correct with button operated crossing lights?

Regards Bernard.

146195931 over 1 year ago

Hi, These areas aren't houses they are residential areas. They should be reduced to individual house areas.

Regards Bernard.

156130057 over 1 year ago

Hi, The relation should be edited, but this is not very easy to do with the iD editor. It is very easy to break a relation without realising. Can you point out which section of the path you mean and I'l try to help using the JOSM editor?