BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 156130057 | over 1 year ago | Hi, There were several sections of duplicated highways introduced to the database by this changeset. I think I've corrected all the problems. Regards Bernard. |
| 156096974 | over 1 year ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Is the building still an ambulance station? Regards Bernard. |
| 156105312 | over 1 year ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. It's better to amend/correct existing mapped features rather than deleting and re-drawing then the complete history is kept on the feature. I've reverted your changes and corrected the existing building outlines. Thus, the information you deleted with the building outline is also reinstated. Regards Bernard. |
| 156071080 | over 1 year ago | Hello, I don't think this building now exists, I think there are several new buildings on the site. Would you agree? If so this building should be removed. Regards Bernard. |
| 156070970 | over 1 year ago | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Sorry to have to say there is a problem here. As warned above your new building outline Way: BDT Transport (1312675201) is placed on top of an existing building, duplication. It's OSM practice that if a mapped feature needs amending or correcting the correction is done to the existing feature if possible. Thus your amendment should be made to the existing building, and then the building's mapping history is maintained in full. I've placed your new tags on the existing building outline and removed the new duplicate building line. Hope this helps and guides.
|
| 156016912 | over 1 year ago | Hi, The above applies to Way: 1312436749 as well which I've removed. Does the bridge Way: 1312436750 actually exist Or should this also be removed? Regards Bernard. |
| 156016912 | over 1 year ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your informal path Way: 1312436748 was placed almost entirely on top of existing highways, this would seriously disrupt routing. Thus I've removed the path. Regards Bernard. |
| 155871317 | over 1 year ago | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You've unfortunately made many mistakes here. Way: 1311731991, Way: 1311731989, Way: 1311731985, Way: 1311731980, Way: 1311786965, Way: 1311731993, Way: 1311731995 had in part been placed on top of existing highways which disrupts routing. I've made many corrections. Way: 1311786939, Way: 1311731992, Way: 442062624 were wrong in many ways so I've removed them. I've corrected bridges, and added some. A lot of your areas (grass), are joined to highway centerlines which is incorrect. Grass or woods do not extend across main highways. You've mapped many nodes as highway=crossing where there are no formal crossings. With 150+ ways in this changeset it's difficult for you to check your work before uploading. Please consider limiting the number of changes in a changeset to maybe 10 to 15, then you can easily check for mistakes. Regards Bernard. |
| 155816387 | over 1 year ago | Removed footpath as it duplicates another highway. Removed steps tag |
| 155844980 | over 1 year ago | Hi, self intersections removed, buildings joined at party walls, all squared up. |
| 155777109 | over 1 year ago | Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. There is some access to these paths so it's incorrect to just say access=no. There is access on foot and being agricultural land there would be agricultural access. You would need to define the type of access that is not allowed before saying access=no. I've amended or removed your access=no tags. Regards Bernard. |
| 155538775 | over 1 year ago | Hello, There are many warnings given above, several of these warnings could be mapping that could cause disruption to routing. Could you please look at and try to fix some of the problems? Regards Bernard. |
| 155389273 | over 1 year ago | Hi, It looks like your landcover tag is being used wrongly, the areas you've mapped are actually individual trees or tree lines as you've previously accepted. As such OSM practice says they should be nodes or linear features not area features. Whatever you add to OSM should be correct ground truth and verifiably. So features of temporary or personal nature should not be added. Thus the landcover tagged areas should be removed. You can map temporary or personal features with JOSM and save them without uploading to the OSM database. Perhaps you could use this method ASAP to hold the landcover features for you future use. OSM is a live worldwide database from which thousands of maps are compiled. Other users have a right to expect it to be consistent, so I'll continue to correct anyones mapping in order to better OSM. |
| 155389273 | over 1 year ago | Hi, I've removed the bridge tag from the footpaths, also added layer tags to the bridges. |
| 155285226 | over 1 year ago | Hi, I've made amendments to rectify the warnings given above which relate to highways. |
| 155237669 | over 1 year ago | Hi, I've just removed 5 sections of duplicated highways. Please take care not to make duplicated highways as it could cause problems with routing. Making very large changesets, (about 250 features edited/added here), makes it very difficult for you or anyone else to spot mistakes. 10 features in a changeset is easy to check. Regards Bernard. |
| 155236325 | over 1 year ago | Hello SomeoneElse,
Regards Bernard. |
| 155149223 | over 1 year ago | Hi, Your fantasy mapping has been removed. OSM is a live worldwide database to which fantasy mapping is not welcome. There are other places to construct fantasy maps a Google search will assist you. Regards Bernard. |
| 155005631 | over 1 year ago | Hello,
Regards Bernard. |
| 154704730 | over 1 year ago | No response so I've corrected as best I can. |