OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
156130057 over 1 year ago

Hi, There were several sections of duplicated highways introduced to the database by this changeset. I think I've corrected all the problems.

Regards Bernard.

156096974 over 1 year ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Is the building still an ambulance station?

Regards Bernard.

156105312 over 1 year ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

It's better to amend/correct existing mapped features rather than deleting and re-drawing then the complete history is kept on the feature. I've reverted your changes and corrected the existing building outlines. Thus, the information you deleted with the building outline is also reinstated.

Regards Bernard.

156071080 over 1 year ago

Hello, I don't think this building now exists, I think there are several new buildings on the site. Would you agree? If so this building should be removed.

Regards Bernard.

156070970 over 1 year ago

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Sorry to have to say there is a problem here. As warned above your new building outline Way: BDT Transport (1312675201) is placed on top of an existing building, duplication. It's OSM practice that if a mapped feature needs amending or correcting the correction is done to the existing feature if possible. Thus your amendment should be made to the existing building, and then the building's mapping history is maintained in full.

I've placed your new tags on the existing building outline and removed the new duplicate building line.

Hope this helps and guides.
Regards Bernard.

156016912 over 1 year ago

Hi, The above applies to Way: 1312436749 as well which I've removed. Does the bridge Way: 1312436750 actually exist Or should this also be removed?

Regards Bernard.

156016912 over 1 year ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your informal path Way: 1312436748 was placed almost entirely on top of existing highways, this would seriously disrupt routing. Thus I've removed the path.

Regards Bernard.

155871317 over 1 year ago

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You've unfortunately made many mistakes here. Way: 1311731991, Way: 1311731989, Way: 1311731985, Way: 1311731980, Way: 1311786965, Way: 1311731993, Way: 1311731995 had in part been placed on top of existing highways which disrupts routing. I've made many corrections.

Way: 1311786939, Way: 1311731992, Way: 442062624 were wrong in many ways so I've removed them.

I've corrected bridges, and added some.

A lot of your areas (grass), are joined to highway centerlines which is incorrect. Grass or woods do not extend across main highways.

You've mapped many nodes as highway=crossing where there are no formal crossings.

With 150+ ways in this changeset it's difficult for you to check your work before uploading. Please consider limiting the number of changes in a changeset to maybe 10 to 15, then you can easily check for mistakes.

Regards Bernard.

155816387 over 1 year ago

Removed footpath as it duplicates another highway. Removed steps tag

155844980 over 1 year ago

Hi, self intersections removed, buildings joined at party walls, all squared up.

155777109 over 1 year ago

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

There is some access to these paths so it's incorrect to just say access=no. There is access on foot and being agricultural land there would be agricultural access. You would need to define the type of access that is not allowed before saying access=no. I've amended or removed your access=no tags.

Regards Bernard.

155538775 over 1 year ago

Hello,

There are many warnings given above, several of these warnings could be mapping that could cause disruption to routing. Could you please look at and try to fix some of the problems?

Regards Bernard.

155389273 over 1 year ago

Hi, It looks like your landcover tag is being used wrongly, the areas you've mapped are actually individual trees or tree lines as you've previously accepted. As such OSM practice says they should be nodes or linear features not area features. Whatever you add to OSM should be correct ground truth and verifiably. So features of temporary or personal nature should not be added. Thus the landcover tagged areas should be removed.

You can map temporary or personal features with JOSM and save them without uploading to the OSM database. Perhaps you could use this method ASAP to hold the landcover features for you future use.

OSM is a live worldwide database from which thousands of maps are compiled. Other users have a right to expect it to be consistent, so I'll continue to correct anyones mapping in order to better OSM.

155389273 over 1 year ago

Hi, I've removed the bridge tag from the footpaths, also added layer tags to the bridges.

155285226 over 1 year ago

Hi, I've made amendments to rectify the warnings given above which relate to highways.

155237669 over 1 year ago

Hi, I've just removed 5 sections of duplicated highways. Please take care not to make duplicated highways as it could cause problems with routing. Making very large changesets, (about 250 features edited/added here), makes it very difficult for you or anyone else to spot mistakes. 10 features in a changeset is easy to check.

Regards Bernard.

155236325 over 1 year ago

Hello SomeoneElse,
I think this new users changesets look very similar to user Grayson Braham-Dopwell who has just been blocked.
I'll leave it for you to revert if you think the same.

Regards Bernard.

155149223 over 1 year ago

Hi, Your fantasy mapping has been removed. OSM is a live worldwide database to which fantasy mapping is not welcome. There are other places to construct fantasy maps a Google search will assist you.

Regards Bernard.

155005631 over 1 year ago

Hello,
It seems from the warnings above and the few problems I've just corrected that the are imperfections in your mapping. The warnings above state 31 crossing highways and 23 disconnected highways. I've removed several duplicated sections of highway. These problems ought to be resolved as they could lead to disruption of routing.

Regards Bernard.

154704730 over 1 year ago

No response so I've corrected as best I can.